What is Mustache and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Mustache
Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be. ...
Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation ...
It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed. ...
Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates. ...
It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates. ...
Mustache alternatives & related posts
- Great templating language77
- Open source50
- Integrates well into any codebase20
- Easy to create helper methods for complex scenarios10
- Created by Yehuda Katz7
- Easy For Fornt End Developers,learn backend2
related Handlebars.js posts
- Type safe102
- The best AltJS ever47
- Best AltJS for BackEnd27
- Powerful type system, including generics & JS features15
- Nice and seamless hybrid of static and dynamic typing11
- Aligned with ES development for compatibility10
- Compile time errors10
- Structural, rather than nominal, subtyping7
- Garbage collection1
- Code may look heavy and confusing5
related TypeScript posts
Visual Studio Code worked really well for us as well, it worked well with all our polyglot services and the .Net core integration had great cross-platform developer experience (to be fair, F# was a bit trickier) - actually, each of our team members used a different OS (Ubuntu, macos, windows). Our production deployment ran for a time on Docker Swarm until we've decided to adopt Kubernetes with almost seamless migration process.
After our positive experience of running .Net core workloads in containers and developing Tweek's .Net services on non-windows machines, C# had gained back some of its popularity (originally lost to Node.js), and other teams have been using it for developing microservices, k8s sidecars (like https://github.com/Soluto/airbag), cli tools, serverless functions and other projects...
I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.
A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.
In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.
If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.
- Elegant html136
- Great with nodejs89
- Very short syntax58
- Open source57
- Structured with indentation53
- It's not HAML5
- Really similar to Slim (from Ruby fame)5
- Clean syntax4
- Readable code4
- Easy setup4
- Difficult For Front End Developers,learn backend4
- Disdain for angled brackets3
related Pug posts
related Smarty posts
- It is simple to use7
related Jinja posts
related Hogan.js posts
- For both nodejs and php2
- Native html, xml, txt etc2
- Front to back with no efforts2
related Twig posts
- It'a easy to understand the concept behind it4
- Quick for templating UI project3
- You almost know how to use it from start1