StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Earthly vs Portainer

Earthly vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
Earthly
Earthly
Stacks9
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.9K
Forks439

Earthly vs Portainer: What are the differences?

<Earthly and Portainer are both popular tools used for managing Docker containers. However, they differ in several key aspects.>

  1. Deployment: One significant difference between Earthly and Portainer is in their approach to deployment. Earthly focuses on defining build processes in a clear and concise manner using Earthfiles, while Portainer emphasizes the management and monitoring of Docker containers through a user-friendly graphical interface.

  2. Building Tasks: Earthly offers a modern build system that allows developers to define complex build pipelines using a declarative syntax. In contrast, Portainer provides a simplified way to manage containers, volumes, networks, and images with its intuitive user interface, making it more suitable for users who prioritize ease of use over advanced build capabilities.

  3. Version Control Integration: Earthly integrates seamlessly with version control systems like Git, enabling developers to track changes to their build processes and collaborate effectively within a team. On the other hand, Portainer lacks built-in version control capabilities, focusing primarily on container management tasks.

  4. Flexibility: Earthly provides a high degree of flexibility by allowing users to define custom build steps, dependencies, and outputs in a single Earthfile. In comparison, while Portainer offers a user-friendly experience for container management, it may lack the same level of customization and flexibility in defining complex build behaviors.

  5. Execution Environment: Earthly allows users to define and control the build environment explicitly, ensuring consistency and reproducibility across different platforms. In contrast, Portainer automates the management of containers without providing as much control over the execution environment, making it easier to get started but potentially limiting for advanced users with specific requirements.

  6. Community Support: Earthly has a growing community of users and contributors who actively engage in discussions, provide feedback, and contribute to the tool's development. Portainer also has a supportive community but may not offer the same level of community-driven development and resources available for Earthly users.

In Summary, Earthly and Portainer differ in their approach to deployment, building tasks, version control integration, flexibility, execution environment, and community support, catering to different user preferences and requirements in managing Docker containers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
Earthly
Earthly

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

It is a build automation tool for the post-container era. It allows you to execute all your builds in containers. This makes them self-contained, reproducible, portable and parallel. You can use it to create Docker images and artifacts (eg binaries, packages, arbitrary files).

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Programming language agnostic; Reproducible builds; Parallelism that just works; Mono-repo friendly; Multi-repo friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
439
Stacks
506
Stacks
9
Followers
842
Followers
14
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
CircleCI
CircleCI
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

What are some alternatives to Portainer, Earthly?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana