StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Elasticsearch vs TimescaleDB

Elasticsearch vs TimescaleDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.5K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Stacks227
Followers374
Votes44
GitHub Stars20.6K
Forks988

Elasticsearch vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

Elasticsearch and TimescaleDB are two popular database management systems, each with its own strengths and use cases. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Elasticsearch and TimescaleDB.

  1. Data Model and Query Language: Elasticsearch is a schema-less, document-oriented database that uses a JSON-based query language. It stores and indexes data in near real-time and supports diverse data types. On the other hand, TimescaleDB is a relational time-series database that extends PostgreSQL, providing the ability to handle time-series data efficiently. It utilizes SQL as its query language and offers additional functions and optimizations specifically designed for time-series data.

  2. Indexing and Search Capabilities: Elasticsearch is known for its powerful search capabilities and full-text indexing. It provides advanced search features like relevance scoring, tokenization, and language analysis. The search queries can span across multiple fields and documents. Conversely, TimescaleDB focuses on efficient time-series data storage and query optimizations. Its indexing mechanism is optimized for time-series data, enabling faster data ingestion and retrieval based on time ranges.

  3. Scalability and Distribution: Elasticsearch is built for horizontal scalability and distributed architectures. It can handle large clusters of nodes and automatically distributes data across the cluster for load balancing and fault tolerance. In contrast, TimescaleDB inherits the scalability features of PostgreSQL, allowing for vertical scalability and support for high-performance hardware. However, it does not natively support automatic data distribution and sharding across multiple nodes.

  4. Data Replication and High Availability: Elasticsearch supports automatic data replication and provides built-in resilience against node failures. It ensures high availability of data by maintaining multiple copies of data across the cluster. On the other hand, TimescaleDB relies on PostgreSQL's replication mechanisms for data redundancy and high availability. It provides options for asynchronous and synchronous replication, giving users more control over replication configurations.

  5. Data Modelling and Schema Evolution: Elasticsearch offers flexible and dynamic data modeling, allowing users to easily add or modify fields in documents without changing the schema. This makes it well-suited for use cases where the data schema evolves over time. Conversely, TimescaleDB follows a more traditional relational data model with predefined schemas. Schema changes require altering tables, which can be a more complex and time-consuming process.

  6. Ecosystem and Integration: Elasticsearch has a rich ecosystem and extensive integration support with various tools and frameworks. It provides plugins and APIs for easy integration with data ingestion pipelines, analytics platforms, and visualization tools. TimescaleDB, being an extension of PostgreSQL, benefits from the vast PostgreSQL ecosystem and supports integration with numerous PostgreSQL-compatible tools and libraries.

In Summary, Elasticsearch is a schema-less, document-oriented database with powerful search capabilities, built for horizontal scalability, and optimized for full-text search. TimescaleDB, on the other hand, is a relational time-series database that extends PostgreSQL, designed for efficient time-series data storage, and provides strong consistency and scalability, albeit without automatic data distribution and search optimizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension;Full ANSI SQL;JOINs (e.g., across PostgreSQL tables);Complex queries;Secondary indexes;Composite indexes;Support for very high cardinality data;Triggers;Constraints;UPSERTS;JSON/JSONB;Ability to ingest out of order data;Ability to perform accurate rollups;Data retention policies;Fast deletes;Integration with PostGIS and the rest of the PostgreSQL ecosystem;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
20.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
988
Stacks
35.5K
Stacks
227
Followers
27.1K
Followers
374
Votes
1.6K
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Easy Query Language
  • 7
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
Cons
  • 5
    Licensing issues when running on managed databases
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
Prometheus
Prometheus
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Django
Django
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
pgAdmin
pgAdmin
Python
Python
Kafka
Kafka
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase