Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
Elasticsearch and TimescaleDB are two popular database management systems, each with its own strengths and use cases. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Elasticsearch and TimescaleDB.
Data Model and Query Language: Elasticsearch is a schema-less, document-oriented database that uses a JSON-based query language. It stores and indexes data in near real-time and supports diverse data types. On the other hand, TimescaleDB is a relational time-series database that extends PostgreSQL, providing the ability to handle time-series data efficiently. It utilizes SQL as its query language and offers additional functions and optimizations specifically designed for time-series data.
Indexing and Search Capabilities: Elasticsearch is known for its powerful search capabilities and full-text indexing. It provides advanced search features like relevance scoring, tokenization, and language analysis. The search queries can span across multiple fields and documents. Conversely, TimescaleDB focuses on efficient time-series data storage and query optimizations. Its indexing mechanism is optimized for time-series data, enabling faster data ingestion and retrieval based on time ranges.
Scalability and Distribution: Elasticsearch is built for horizontal scalability and distributed architectures. It can handle large clusters of nodes and automatically distributes data across the cluster for load balancing and fault tolerance. In contrast, TimescaleDB inherits the scalability features of PostgreSQL, allowing for vertical scalability and support for high-performance hardware. However, it does not natively support automatic data distribution and sharding across multiple nodes.
Data Replication and High Availability: Elasticsearch supports automatic data replication and provides built-in resilience against node failures. It ensures high availability of data by maintaining multiple copies of data across the cluster. On the other hand, TimescaleDB relies on PostgreSQL's replication mechanisms for data redundancy and high availability. It provides options for asynchronous and synchronous replication, giving users more control over replication configurations.
Data Modelling and Schema Evolution: Elasticsearch offers flexible and dynamic data modeling, allowing users to easily add or modify fields in documents without changing the schema. This makes it well-suited for use cases where the data schema evolves over time. Conversely, TimescaleDB follows a more traditional relational data model with predefined schemas. Schema changes require altering tables, which can be a more complex and time-consuming process.
Ecosystem and Integration: Elasticsearch has a rich ecosystem and extensive integration support with various tools and frameworks. It provides plugins and APIs for easy integration with data ingestion pipelines, analytics platforms, and visualization tools. TimescaleDB, being an extension of PostgreSQL, benefits from the vast PostgreSQL ecosystem and supports integration with numerous PostgreSQL-compatible tools and libraries.
In Summary, Elasticsearch is a schema-less, document-oriented database with powerful search capabilities, built for horizontal scalability, and optimized for full-text search. TimescaleDB, on the other hand, is a relational time-series database that extends PostgreSQL, designed for efficient time-series data storage, and provides strong consistency and scalability, albeit without automatic data distribution and search optimizations.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.
So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily
We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.
Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.
if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.
I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.
The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)
We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api329
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Awesome, great tool4
- Great docs4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Nosql DB2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Reliable2
- Potato2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Great piece of software2
- Open1
- Scalability1
- Not stable1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Community0
Pros of TimescaleDB
- Open source9
- Easy Query Language8
- Time-series data analysis7
- Established postgresql API and support5
- Reliable4
- Paid support for automatic Retention Policy2
- Chunk-based compression2
- Postgres integration2
- High-performance2
- Fast and scalable2
- Case studies1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4
Cons of TimescaleDB
- Licensing issues when running on managed databases5