Electron vs UIkIt

Overview

UIkIt

Stacks791

Followers417

Votes262

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks2.3K

Electron

Stacks11.6K

Followers10.0K

Votes148

Electron vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Architecture: Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, whereas UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces.
Installation: Electron requires the installation of Node.js and NPM to create desktop applications, while UIkit can be easily added to a project by including the CSS and JavaScript files or using a package manager like npm or yarn.
User Interface Components: Electron provides rich desktop-specific UI components like menus, dialogs, and system tray icons, while UIkit offers a wide range of responsive and customizable components such as navigation bars, buttons, and modals for web interfaces.
Platform Support: Electron supports building apps for Windows, macOS, and Linux desktop platforms, while UIkit is focused on creating responsive web designs that work well across different devices and browsers.
Development Environment: Electron provides a built-in development environment with tools like Chromium DevTools for debugging, testing, and profiling desktop applications, whereas UIkit relies on browser developer tools like Chrome DevTools for web interface development.
Community and Ecosystem: Electron has a larger community and ecosystem due to its popularity for building desktop applications, offering a wide range of plugins, libraries, and tutorials, while UIkit has a dedicated community focused on front-end web development, providing resources like themes, addons, and documentation.

In Summary, the key differences between Electron and UIkit lie in their architecture, installation process, user interface components, platform support, development environments, and community ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on UIkIt, Electron

Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceon

New Relic

Next.js

React

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M

Comments

Semih

Software Engineering Manager

Oct 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

JavaScript

HTML5

.NET

Hi,

We are planning to develop a brand new UX for an already existing desktop software. The previous version is developed on C#.NET with Winforms & WPF. Our plan is to use JavaScript/HTML5 based frontend technologies for the new software. For some components, we are highly dependent on .NET/ .NET Core because the JS-based versions are not mature enough.

What would you choose for a desktop-based Engineering Software that supports multi-OS and has rich UI capabilities considering the .NET dependencies?

Thanks in advance,

Semih

57.9k views57.9k

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt	Electron
UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.	With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.
LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.	Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars 18.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 791	Stacks 11.6K
Followers 417	Followers 10.0K
Votes 262	Votes 148
Pros & Cons
Pros 39 Complete GUI 29 Easy modify 27 Practical 24 Easy to learn 24 Functional	Pros 69 Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications 53 Open source 14 Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code 8 Because it's cross platform 4 Use Node.js in the Main Process Cons 19 Uses a lot of memory 8 User experience never as good as a native app 4 No proper documentation 4 Does not native 1 Wrong reference for dom inspection

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Electron?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Electron vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

Architecture: Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, whereas UIkit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces.
Installation: Electron requires the installation of Node.js and NPM to create desktop applications, while UIkit can be easily added to a project by including the CSS and JavaScript files or using a package manager like npm or yarn.
User Interface Components: Electron provides rich desktop-specific UI components like menus, dialogs, and system tray icons, while UIkit offers a wide range of responsive and customizable components such as navigation bars, buttons, and modals for web interfaces.
Platform Support: Electron supports building apps for Windows, macOS, and Linux desktop platforms, while UIkit is focused on creating responsive web designs that work well across different devices and browsers.
Development Environment: Electron provides a built-in development environment with tools like Chromium DevTools for debugging, testing, and profiling desktop applications, whereas UIkit relies on browser developer tools like Chrome DevTools for web interface development.
Community and Ecosystem: Electron has a larger community and ecosystem due to its popularity for building desktop applications, offering a wide range of plugins, libraries, and tutorials, while UIkit has a dedicated community focused on front-end web development, providing resources like themes, addons, and documentation.

Electron vs UIkIt

Overview