StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Relational Databases
  4. Postgresql As A Service
  5. ElephantSQL vs MongoDB

ElephantSQL vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ElephantSQL
ElephantSQL
Stacks15
Followers86
Votes15
MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K

ElephantSQL vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

ElephantSQL and MongoDB are both popular databases used in web development. However, they differ in several key aspects. In this article, we will explore the differences between ElephantSQL and MongoDB.

  1. Data Models: ElephantSQL follows the relational database model, which organizes data into tables with predefined schemas. On the other hand, MongoDB is a NoSQL database that uses a document-based model, where data is stored in flexible, schema-less documents in JSON-like format.

  2. Scalability: ElephantSQL offers vertical scalability, meaning it allows you to increase the capacity of a single server by adding more resources such as CPU or RAM. MongoDB, on the other hand, offers horizontal scalability, allowing you to distribute data across multiple servers in a cluster, providing better performance and handling larger datasets.

  3. Query Language: ElephantSQL utilizes SQL (Structured Query Language), the industry-standard language for managing relational databases. MongoDB uses its own query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL), which is specifically designed for querying document-based databases. MQL offers more flexibility and power in querying complex nested structures.

  4. Schema Flexibility: ElephantSQL requires a predefined schema, meaning you need to define the structure of your data before inserting it into a table. MongoDB, being schema-less, allows you to store data without a predefined schema, providing more flexibility, especially when dealing with evolving data models.

  5. Data Integrity: ElephantSQL ensures data integrity through the use of constraints, such as primary keys and foreign keys, which enforce referential integrity and maintain data consistency. MongoDB does not offer built-in support for constraints, making it more suitable for scenarios where flexibility is prioritized over data integrity.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: ElephantSQL has been around for a longer time and has a well-established community with a wide range of resources and support available. MongoDB, being a newer technology, also has a growing community and an extensive ecosystem, offering various tools, libraries, and frameworks.

In Summary, ElephantSQL is a relational database that follows a predefined schema model and offers vertical scalability, while MongoDB is a NoSQL database that uses a flexible document-based model, provides horizontal scalability, and offers a more flexible data model with no predefined schema.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ElephantSQL, MongoDB

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ElephantSQL
ElephantSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB

ElephantSQL hosts PostgreSQL on Amazon EC2 in multiple regions and availability zones. The servers are continuously transferring the Write-Ahead-Log (the transaction log) to S3 for maximum reliability.

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Continuous backup to S3;Automatic failover;24/7 monitoring;Extenstions- HStore, Full Text search, Crypto and many more.;Latest version- ElephantSQL always boosts the latest stable version of PostgreSQL.
Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
15
Stacks
96.6K
Followers
86
Followers
82.0K
Votes
15
Votes
4.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    They suck
  • 1
    Monitoring
  • 1
    Geospatial support
  • 1
    Easy backup
  • 1
    Easy setup
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Integrations
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Heroku
Heroku
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
cloudControl
cloudControl
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ElephantSQL, MongoDB?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase