StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Emacs vs Gerrit Code Review

Emacs vs Gerrit Code Review

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Emacs
Emacs
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes322
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Emacs vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?

Introduction: This Markdown code outlines the key differences between Emacs and Gerrit Code Review, highlighting specific aspects that set these two tools apart in the development landscape.

1. Customization and Extensibility: Emacs is highly customizable and extensible through the use of Emacs Lisp, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific needs by adding new functionalities or modifying existing ones. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review is focused on code review processes and lacks the extensive customization capabilities of Emacs.

2. User Interface: Emacs has a powerful but steep learning curve with its command-driven interface that requires memorizing numerous key bindings for efficient usage. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review provides a more intuitive web-based interface that simplifies the code review process for users, particularly those who are not well-versed in Emacs commands.

3. Collaboration Features: Gerrit Code Review is specifically designed for collaborative development, offering features like reviewing changesets, commenting on code, and tracking the progress of code reviews. While Emacs also supports collaboration through plugins and integrations, it is primarily an individual productivity tool rather than a dedicated platform for team code reviews.

4. Version Control Integration: Gerrit Code Review integrates seamlessly with Git, providing a tight coupling between the code review process and version control system. Emacs, on the other hand, can be configured to work with various version control systems, but the level of integration may not be as deep as that offered by Gerrit for Git.

5. Workflow Automation: Gerrit Code Review streamlines the code review workflow by automating tasks such as assigning reviewers, setting up approval criteria, and triggering notifications based on predefined rules. In contrast, Emacs relies on the user's manual intervention and customization to manage workflows, lacking the built-in automation capabilities of Gerrit Code Review.

6. Code Review Focus: While Emacs is a versatile text editor with a wide range of features beyond code editing, Gerrit Code Review is purpose-built for code review processes, offering specialized tools and functionalities tailored specifically for reviewing and improving code quality.

In Summary, the key differences between Emacs and Gerrit Code Review lie in customization and extensibility, user interface, collaboration features, version control integration, workflow automation, and code review focus, highlighting varying strengths and focuses in the development tools landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Emacs
Emacs
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Content-sensitive editing modes, including syntax coloring, for a variety of file types including plain text, source code, and HTML.;Complete built-in documentation, including a tutorial for new users.;Full Unicode support for nearly all human languages and their scripts.;Highly customizable, using Emacs Lisp code or a graphical interface.;A large number of extensions that add other functionality, including a project planner, mail and news reader, debugger interface, calendar, and more. Many of these extensions are distributed with GNU Emacs others are available separately.
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
116
Followers
1.2K
Followers
223
Votes
322
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Vast array of extensions
  • 44
    Have all you can imagine
  • 40
    Everything i need in one place
  • 39
    Portability
  • 32
    Customer config
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to learn for beginners
  • 4
    So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked
  • 1
    Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Emacs, Gerrit Code Review?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana