Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Emacs vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Emacs and Visual Studio Code
Platform Compatibility: Emacs is primarily designed for Unix-like systems, including Linux and Mac OS, although there are versions available for Windows as well. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is built to work on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This difference in platform compatibility allows Visual Studio Code to be used on a wider range of operating systems.
User Interface: Emacs has a command-line interface with a text-based user interface, allowing users to interact with the software through text commands. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, provides a modern and visually appealing user interface with a graphical user interface. This graphical interface makes it easier to navigate and use the various features and functionalities of the editor.
Extensions and Plugins: Visual Studio Code has a vast and active ecosystem of extensions and plugins developed by the community, which can enhance its functionality and provide additional features. These extensions can be easily installed and managed through the Visual Studio Code marketplace. Emacs, on the other hand, has its own package manager called "ELPA" (Emacs Lisp Package Archive) that allows users to install and manage packages, but its ecosystem of extensions might not be as extensive as Visual Studio Code.
Default Features and Built-in Tools: Emacs comes with a wide range of pre-installed features and built-in tools, including a powerful text editor, a file manager, a version control system, and a debugger. These default features make Emacs a versatile and comprehensive development environment. While Visual Studio Code also provides a set of built-in tools and features, it offers a more modular approach where users can install specific extensions or plugins to tailor the editor according to their needs.
Customization Options: Emacs is renowned for its flexibility and extensibility. Users can easily customize almost every aspect of the editor's behavior, from keybindings to the appearance and functionality of various modes. Visual Studio Code also allows customization through user settings and extension configurations, but its level of customization might not be as deep and comprehensive as Emacs.
Integration with Other Tools and Services: Visual Studio Code has excellent integration with various tools and services commonly used in the modern software development workflow. It allows seamless integration with version control systems like Git, build tools like npm and Maven, and cloud platforms like Azure and AWS. While Emacs also supports integration with third-party tools and services, the level of integration and ease of use might vary compared to Visual Studio Code.
In summary, Emacs is a powerful and highly customizable editor primarily designed for Unix-like systems, with a command-line interface and extensive default features. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is a cross-platform editor with a graphical interface, a rich ecosystem of extensions and plugins, and strong integration with modern development tools and services.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Emacs
- Vast array of extensions65
- Have all you can imagine44
- Everything i need in one place40
- Portability39
- Customer config32
- Your config works on any platform16
- Low memory consumption13
- Perfect for monsters11
- All life inside one program10
- Extendable, portable, fast - all at your fingertips8
- Enables extremely rapid keyboard-only navigation6
- Widely-used keybindings (e.g. by bash)5
- Extensible in Lisp5
- Runs everywhere important5
- FOSS Software4
- Powerful multilanguage IDE4
- Git integration4
- May be old but always reliable4
- Asynchronous3
- Powerful UI3
- Huge ecosystem1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Emacs
- So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked4
- Hard to learn for beginners4
- Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux1
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1