EMQ vs IBM MQ

Overview

EMQX

Stacks34

Followers109

Votes6

GitHub Stars15.4K

Forks2.4K

IBM MQ

Stacks118

Followers187

Votes11

EMQ vs IBM MQ: What are the differences?

Message Queuing Model: EMQ and IBM MQ differ in their message queuing models. EMQ uses the publish-subscribe model, where messages are published to a topic and subscribers choose which topics they are interested in receiving messages from. On the other hand, IBM MQ uses the point-to-point model, where each message is sent to a specific queue and is delivered to only one recipient.
Supported Platforms: Another key difference between EMQ and IBM MQ is their supported platforms. EMQ is designed to be a lightweight and highly scalable open-source MQTT broker, primarily targeting IoT platforms. In contrast, IBM MQ is a robust enterprise messaging solution that offers support for various operating systems and platforms, including mainframe, distributed, and cloud environments.
Protocols and Standards: EMQ and IBM MQ also differ in the protocols and standards they support. EMQ primarily supports MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport), which is a lightweight protocol specifically designed for IoT messaging. IBM MQ, on the other hand, supports a wide range of communication protocols, including MQTT, HTTP, AMQP, and REST, making it more versatile and suitable for different messaging scenarios.
Security Features: When it comes to security, EMQ and IBM MQ have different sets of security features. EMQ offers basic security mechanisms, such as authentication and authorization, to ensure secure communication between clients and the broker. IBM MQ, being an enterprise messaging solution, provides more advanced security features, including SSL/TLS encryption, message integrity checks, and access control lists, to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance with industry standards.
Scalability and Performance: EMQ and IBM MQ also have differences in terms of scalability and performance. EMQ is designed to be highly scalable and can handle a large number of concurrent connections and messages, making it suitable for IoT applications with high message throughput. IBM MQ, on the other hand, is known for its high performance and reliability, with features like message persistence and transactional support that ensure message delivery and durability in demanding enterprise environments.
Ease of Use and Administration: Lastly, EMQ and IBM MQ differ in terms of ease of use and administration. EMQ is designed to be lightweight and easy to set up, with a user-friendly web dashboard for managing MQTT connections and topics. IBM MQ, being an enterprise messaging solution, provides a more comprehensive set of management tools and APIs for configuring and monitoring messaging resources, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments.

In summary, EMQ and IBM MQ differ in their message queuing models, supported platforms, protocols and standards, security features, scalability and performance, and ease of use and administration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

EMQX	IBM MQ
EMQX is a cloud-native, MQTT-based, IoT messaging platform designed for high reliability and massive scale. Licensed under the Apache Version 2.0, EMQX is 100% compliant with MQTT 5.0 and 3.x standard protocol specifications.	It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
Scale to 100 million concurrent MQTT connections with a single EMQX 5.0 cluster./Licensed under the Apache Version 2.0, 100% compliant with MQTT 5.0 and 3.x standard protocol specifications for better scalability, security, and reliability./Move and process millions of MQTT messages per second in a single broker./Guarantee sub-millisecond latency in message delivery with the soft real-time runtime./Achieve high availability and horizontal scalability with a masterless distributed architecture./Easy to deploy on-premises and in public clouds with Kubernetes Operator and Terraform.	Once-and-once-only delivery; Asynchronous messaging; Powerful protection; Simplified, smart management; Augmented security; Expanded client application options
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 34	Stacks 118
Followers 109	Followers 187
Votes 6	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 QoS 2 2 Clusters 1 Plugins	Pros 3 Useful for big enteprises 3 Reliable for banking transactions 2 Secure 1 Many deployment options (containers, cloud, VM etc) 1 High Availability Cons 2 Cost
Integrations
Linux Cassandra Kafka MongoDB	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to EMQX, IBM MQ?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

EMQ vs IBM MQ: What are the differences?

Message Queuing Model: EMQ and IBM MQ differ in their message queuing models. EMQ uses the publish-subscribe model, where messages are published to a topic and subscribers choose which topics they are interested in receiving messages from. On the other hand, IBM MQ uses the point-to-point model, where each message is sent to a specific queue and is delivered to only one recipient.
Supported Platforms: Another key difference between EMQ and IBM MQ is their supported platforms. EMQ is designed to be a lightweight and highly scalable open-source MQTT broker, primarily targeting IoT platforms. In contrast, IBM MQ is a robust enterprise messaging solution that offers support for various operating systems and platforms, including mainframe, distributed, and cloud environments.
Protocols and Standards: EMQ and IBM MQ also differ in the protocols and standards they support. EMQ primarily supports MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport), which is a lightweight protocol specifically designed for IoT messaging. IBM MQ, on the other hand, supports a wide range of communication protocols, including MQTT, HTTP, AMQP, and REST, making it more versatile and suitable for different messaging scenarios.
Security Features: When it comes to security, EMQ and IBM MQ have different sets of security features. EMQ offers basic security mechanisms, such as authentication and authorization, to ensure secure communication between clients and the broker. IBM MQ, being an enterprise messaging solution, provides more advanced security features, including SSL/TLS encryption, message integrity checks, and access control lists, to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance with industry standards.
Scalability and Performance: EMQ and IBM MQ also have differences in terms of scalability and performance. EMQ is designed to be highly scalable and can handle a large number of concurrent connections and messages, making it suitable for IoT applications with high message throughput. IBM MQ, on the other hand, is known for its high performance and reliability, with features like message persistence and transactional support that ensure message delivery and durability in demanding enterprise environments.
Ease of Use and Administration: Lastly, EMQ and IBM MQ differ in terms of ease of use and administration. EMQ is designed to be lightweight and easy to set up, with a user-friendly web dashboard for managing MQTT connections and topics. IBM MQ, being an enterprise messaging solution, provides a more comprehensive set of management tools and APIs for configuring and monitoring messaging resources, making it suitable for complex enterprise environments.

In summary, EMQ and IBM MQ differ in their message queuing models, supported platforms, protocols and standards, security features, scalability and performance, and ease of use and administration.

EMQ vs IBM MQ

Overview