Errbot vs Hubot

Overview

Hubot

Stacks276

Followers236

Votes60

Errbot

Stacks11

Followers18

Votes3

GitHub Stars3.2K

Forks629

Errbot vs Hubot: What are the differences?

Architecture: Errbot is a Python-based chatbot framework that is highly extensible and allows plugins and backends to be easily added. On the other hand, Hubot is built on Node.js and CoffeeScript and also enables easy integration of new scripts and adapters.
Community Support: Errbot has a smaller community compared to Hubot which has a larger and more widespread user base. This can affect the availability of plugins, support, and resources for troubleshooting and development.
Customizability: Errbot offers a higher level of customizability with its Python-based framework, allowing for more complex and tailored chatbot solutions. Hubot, while still customizable, may have limitations in terms of flexibility when compared to Errbot.
Scripting Language: Errbot uses Python for scripting, which may be advantageous for users familiar with the language or prefer its syntax. Meanwhile, Hubot utilizes CoffeeScript, which may have a steeper learning curve or be less familiar to some users.
Ease of Deployment: Hubot is known for its simplicity in deployment, especially within a Docker environment. In contrast, Errbot may require more configuration and setup, potentially making deployment a bit more involved.
Maintenance and Updates: Due to their different architectures and community sizes, the frequency of updates, maintenance, and long-term support for Errbot and Hubot may vary. Users should consider these factors when choosing a platform for their chatbot needs.

In Summary, Errbot and Hubot differ in their architecture, community support, customizability, scripting languages, ease of deployment, and maintenance updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hubot	Errbot
Hubot is a chat bot, modeled after GitHub's Campfire bot, hubot. He's pretty cool. He's extendable with old community scripts, or new community org and your own custom scripts, and can work on many different chat services.	The main use is to make it easy for you to write your own plugins so you can make it do whatever you want: a deployment, retrieving some information online, trigger a tool via an API.
We ship Hubot with a small group of core scripts: things like posting images, translating languages, and integrating with Google Maps;Open source, written in CoffeeScript on Node.js;Extensible;Standardized way to share scripts between everyone's robots	Multiple server backends; Core features; Built-in administration and security; Extensive plugin framework.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 629
Stacks 276	Stacks 11
Followers 236	Followers 18
Votes 60	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Easy setup 13 Extendable 12 Slack integration 11 Free 9 HipChat integration	Pros 1 Python-based 1 Stable community 1 CLI-like commands
Integrations
No integrations available	Zulip StackStorm Mattermost RocketChat Apache OpenWhisk Flowdock Sprint.ly

What are some alternatives to Hubot, Errbot?

Engati

It is a free chatbot platform to build bots quickly without any coding required. It allows you to build, manage, integrate, train, analyse and publish your personalized bot in a matter of minutes.

Dialogflow

Give users new ways to interact with your product by building engaging voice and text-based conversational apps.

Telegram Bot API

Bots are third-party applications that run inside Telegram. Users can interact with bots by sending them messages, commands and inline requests. You control your bots using HTTPS requests to our bot API.

Botpress

Botpress is an open-source bot creation tool written in TypeScript. It is powered by a rich set of open-source modules built by the community. We like to say that Botpress is like the WordPress of bots; anyone can create and reuse other peo

Microsoft Bot Framework

The Microsoft Bot Framework provides just what you need to build and connect intelligent bots that interact naturally wherever your users are talking, from text/sms to Skype, Slack, Office 365 mail and other popular services.

Amazon Lex

Lex provides the advanced deep learning functionalities of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for converting speech to text, and natural language understanding (NLU) to recognize the intent of the text, to enable you to build applications with highly engaging user experiences and lifelike conversational interactions.

Lita

Lita is a chat bot written in Ruby with persistent storage provided by Redis. It uses a plugin system to connect to different chat services and to provide new behavior. The plugin system uses the familiar tools of the Ruby ecosystem: RubyGems and Bundler.

Chatfuel

Send news, collect feedback, receive and answer questions and share content libraries — from GIFs to full business docs.

Flow XO

Everything you need to create and manage bots. Build powerful bots without code, bots work seamlessly across platforms, and we host, manage & scale your bots.

IBM Watson

It combines artificial intelligence (AI) and sophisticated analytical software for optimal performance as a "question answering" machine.

Related Comparisons

Errbot vs Hubot: What are the differences?

Architecture: Errbot is a Python-based chatbot framework that is highly extensible and allows plugins and backends to be easily added. On the other hand, Hubot is built on Node.js and CoffeeScript and also enables easy integration of new scripts and adapters.
Community Support: Errbot has a smaller community compared to Hubot which has a larger and more widespread user base. This can affect the availability of plugins, support, and resources for troubleshooting and development.
Customizability: Errbot offers a higher level of customizability with its Python-based framework, allowing for more complex and tailored chatbot solutions. Hubot, while still customizable, may have limitations in terms of flexibility when compared to Errbot.
Scripting Language: Errbot uses Python for scripting, which may be advantageous for users familiar with the language or prefer its syntax. Meanwhile, Hubot utilizes CoffeeScript, which may have a steeper learning curve or be less familiar to some users.
Ease of Deployment: Hubot is known for its simplicity in deployment, especially within a Docker environment. In contrast, Errbot may require more configuration and setup, potentially making deployment a bit more involved.
Maintenance and Updates: Due to their different architectures and community sizes, the frequency of updates, maintenance, and long-term support for Errbot and Hubot may vary. Users should consider these factors when choosing a platform for their chatbot needs.

In Summary, Errbot and Hubot differ in their architecture, community support, customizability, scripting languages, ease of deployment, and maintenance updates.

Errbot vs Hubot

Overview