StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs JSHint

ESLint vs JSHint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSHint
JSHint
Stacks1.4K
Followers59
Votes0
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs JSHint: What are the differences?

Introduction ESLint and JSHint are both popular JavaScript linting tools that help developers identify and fix code errors, enforce coding conventions, and maintain code quality. While they have similar goals, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: ESLint is built with a pluggable architecture, allowing developers to add or create custom rules. This flexibility enables ESLint to accommodate different coding styles and standards. On the other hand, JSHint has a more rigid architecture and does not have the same level of customizability.

  2. Community support: ESLint has a larger and more active community compared to JSHint. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and rule sets available for ESLint, making it easier to find solutions to specific needs. JSHint, while still supported, has a smaller community and may have fewer resources and updates.

  3. ES2015+ support: ESLint has better support for the latest ECMAScript standards, including ES2015 and beyond. It can handle syntax and rules specific to these newer versions of JavaScript. JSHint, on the other hand, has limited support for these modern language features.

  4. Configurability: ESLint provides a highly configurable setup, allowing developers to specify and fine-tune their linting rules, environments, and plugins. This level of configurability makes ESLint suitable for large-scale projects with specific requirements. JSHint, while configurable to some extent, has fewer options for customization.

  5. Error reporting: ESLint provides more granular and detailed error reporting. It can identify specific line numbers and code locations where issues occur, making it easier for developers to track down and fix problems. JSHint, while also capable of reporting errors, may provide less detailed information about the exact location of the issue.

  6. Integration: ESLint integrates well with various development tools, build systems, and editors, making it easier to incorporate into different workflows. It has extensive support for popular frameworks such as React and Vue.js. JSHint, while it can be used alongside other tools, may have less seamless integration with modern development environments.

In summary, ESLint offers a more customizable and extensible linting solution with better community support and modern JavaScript language feature compatibility compared to JSHint.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on JSHint, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

JSHint
JSHint
ESLint
ESLint

It is a community-driven tool to detect errors and potential problems in JavaScript code. It is open source and can easily adjust in the environment you expect your code to execute.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

community-driven tool; javascript code checker
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
59
Followers
14.0K
Votes
0
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    Non-intuitive configuration
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Integrations
Zendesk
Zendesk
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to JSHint, ESLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana