StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs PHP CodeSniffer

ESLint vs PHP CodeSniffer

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer
Stacks43
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks1.5K

ESLint vs PHP CodeSniffer: What are the differences?

In web development, it is essential to have tools that can analyze and enforce coding standards to ensure code quality and maintainability. Two popular tools for this purpose are ESLint and PHP CodeSniffer. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Customizability: ESLint offers a high level of customizability as it allows developers to define their own linting rules and style guide. This flexibility enables teams to enforce specific coding standards that are unique to their project. On the other hand, PHP CodeSniffer comes with predefined rulesets that are based on best practices, making it less customizable compared to ESLint.

  2. Language Support: ESLint is primarily used for linting JavaScript code, but it also has support for JSX and ECMAScript features. This makes it suitable for modern JavaScript development. In contrast, PHP CodeSniffer is specifically designed for PHP code only, providing comprehensive linting and code sniffing capabilities for PHP projects.

  3. Integration with Editors and IDEs: ESLint has excellent integration with popular code editors and IDEs. It can provide real-time feedback and suggestions while coding, highlighting potential issues and offering auto-fix solutions. PHP CodeSniffer also integrates with popular editors and IDEs, but its real-time feedback capabilities are not as comprehensive as ESLint.

  4. Fixing Capabilities: ESLint not only detects code issues but also provides automated fixes for many of them. Developers can use ESLint to automatically correct code style and formatting problems, saving time and effort. PHP CodeSniffer, on the other hand, mainly focuses on detecting code issues and does not offer extensive automated fixing capabilities.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: ESLint has a larger and more active community compared to PHP CodeSniffer. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and community-driven support available for ESLint. It also makes it easier to find help and documentation when using ESLint for linting tasks. PHP CodeSniffer has a smaller community, which may limit the availability of certain features and support.

  6. Language-specific Features: ESLint is able to leverage the dynamic nature of JavaScript and provide linting capabilities for specific language features, such as async/await, Promises, and JSX syntax. PHP CodeSniffer, being focused on PHP, has built-in support for PHP-specific features, such as namespaces, traits, and PHPDoc comments.

In summary, ESLint offers more customizability, supports multiple languages, provides better integration with editors, has extensive automated fixing capabilities, has a larger community and ecosystem, while PHP CodeSniffer is specifically tailored for PHP code and has built-in support for PHP-specific features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, PHP CodeSniffer

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
PHP CodeSniffer
PHP CodeSniffer

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

It tokenizes PHP, JavaScript and CSS files and detects violations of a defined set of coding standards. It is an essential development tool that ensures your code remains clean and consistent.

-
Code Sniffing; Coding Standard Checking; Coding Standard Fixing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
43
Followers
14.0K
Followers
43
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to ESLint, PHP CodeSniffer?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana