Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PureScript vs Eta JS: What are the differences?
Developers describe PureScript as "A strongly-typed language that compiles to Javascript". A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell. On the other hand, Eta JS is detailed as "Fast, lightweight, pluggable embedded JS template engine". Fast, lightweight, pluggable embedded JS template engine. Supports async templates, partials, and fixes many of the parsing issues with doT and EJS. Faster than most template engines, including EJS, doT, Handlebars, Pug, and Nunjucks.
PureScript and Eta JS belong to "Templating Languages & Extensions" category of the tech stack.
PureScript is an open source tool with 6.42K GitHub stars and 469 GitHub forks. Here's a link to PureScript's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Eta JS
Pros of PureScript
- Purely functional6
- Great FFI to JavaScript4
- The best type system2
- Alternate backends2
- Pursuit1
- More Haskell-ish than Haskell1
- Coherent type classes1
- Libraries1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Eta JS
Cons of PureScript
- No JSX/Template1
- Have Some Bugs1
- Not so fancy error reporting1