StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Gateway
  5. Express Gateway vs Kong

Express Gateway vs Kong

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kong
Kong
Stacks671
Followers1.5K
Votes139
GitHub Stars42.1K
Forks5.0K
Express Gateway
Express Gateway
Stacks62
Followers167
Votes10

Express Gateway vs Kong: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Express Gateway and Kong

Introduction

Express Gateway and Kong are two popular API gateway solutions that help in managing, securing, and scaling APIs. While both provide similar functionalities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Scalability: In terms of scalability, Express Gateway is designed to be lightweight and highly performant, making it suitable for smaller applications or scenarios where lower resource consumption is preferred. On the other hand, Kong is built on top of the Nginx web server, which provides robust performance and scalability, making it a better choice for larger-scale deployments.

  2. Plugin Ecosystem: Kong boasts a vast plugin ecosystem with a large number of community-driven plugins available, allowing users to easily extend its functionalities and integrate with various third-party services. Express Gateway, although it supports plugins, has a more limited plugin ecosystem compared to Kong, which might restrict the available options for customization and integration.

  3. Architecture: Express Gateway follows a microservices architecture where different components of the gateway are decoupled and can be scaled independently. This offers flexibility and modularity in managing and scaling individual components. On the other hand, Kong follows a monolithic architecture, where all the components are tightly integrated within a single application. While this simplifies the deployment process, it might limit the flexibility in customizing and choosing specific components.

  4. Ease of Use: Express Gateway aims to provide a developer-friendly and intuitive user interface, making it easier for developers to set up and configure gateway functionalities. Kong, although it offers a rich set of features, might have a steeper learning curve and require more technical expertise to fully utilize its capabilities.

  5. Community Support: Kong has a larger and more active community compared to Express Gateway, which translates to a stronger support system in terms of documentation, community forums, and third-party resources. This can be beneficial when seeking help, finding solutions to problems, or staying up-to-date with the latest developments.

  6. Commercial Support: Kong offers a commercial variant called Kong Enterprise, which comes with additional features, support, and consultancy services. Express Gateway, being an open-source project, does not have a commercial offering. This might be a crucial factor for organizations requiring enterprise-level support or advanced features beyond the scope of the open-source version.

In summary, while both Express Gateway and Kong serve as effective API gateway solutions, Kong offers greater scalability, a larger plugin ecosystem, and benefits from an active community and commercial support options. Express Gateway, on the other hand, focuses on being lightweight, developer-friendly, and provides flexibility in its microservices architecture. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kong, Express Gateway

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kong
Kong
Express Gateway
Express Gateway

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk; OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs; Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics; IP-restriction: Whitelist or blacklist IPs that can make requests; Authentication: Manage consumer credentials query string and header tokens; Rate-limiting: Block and throttle requests based on IP or authentication; Transformations: Add, remove or manipulate HTTP params and headers on-the-fly; CORS: Enable cross-origin requests to your APIs that would otherwise be blocked; Anything: Need custom functionality? Extend Kong with your own Lua plugins;
Authentication;Authorization;API Management;Microservices;JSON Web Token (JWT);OAuth2;Custom Plugins;Consumer Mgmt;YAML Driven; REST API;Pipelines;Built-in Policies;Hot Reload and Restart;Actions & Conditions;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
671
Stacks
62
Followers
1.5K
Followers
167
Votes
139
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
Pros
  • 4
    Microservices, Body manipulation
  • 3
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Amazing api gwy. Easy and powerful configuration
Cons
  • 2
    Deprecated
Integrations
Cassandra
Cassandra
Docker
Docker
Prometheus
Prometheus
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
NGINX
NGINX
Vagrant
Vagrant
Prometheus
Prometheus
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
StatsD
StatsD
Node.js
Node.js
Azure Kubernetes Service
Azure Kubernetes Service
ExpressJS
ExpressJS

What are some alternatives to Kong, Express Gateway?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp