StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Fabric vs StyleCI

Fabric vs StyleCI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Fabric
Fabric
Stacks494
Followers307
Votes75
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.0K
StyleCI
StyleCI
Stacks28
Followers37
Votes4
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Fabric vs StyleCI: What are the differences?

Developers describe Fabric as "Simple, Pythonic remote execution and deployment". Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.. On the other hand, StyleCI is detailed as "The PHP Coding Style Continuous Integration Service". StyleCI automatically analyses all of your pull requests and will display a build status within GitHub before you merge.

Fabric belongs to "Server Configuration and Automation" category of the tech stack, while StyleCI can be primarily classified under "Code Review".

"Python" is the primary reason why developers consider Fabric over the competitors, whereas "Keeps code style consistent adheres to strict standard" was stated as the key factor in picking StyleCI.

Fabric is an open source tool with 11.4K GitHub stars and 1.73K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Fabric's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Fabric has a broader approval, being mentioned in 147 company stacks & 38 developers stacks; compared to StyleCI, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Fabric
Fabric
StyleCI
StyleCI

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

StyleCI automatically analyses all of your pull requests and will display a build status within GitHub before you merge.

Lets you execute arbitrary Python functions via the command line;Library of subroutines (built on top of a lower-level library) to make executing shell commands over SSH easy and Pythonic
Fix PSR-1, PSR-2, PSR-5, Symfony and more.;We watch all of your pull requests and automatically analyse them.;Open Source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
494
Stacks
28
Followers
307
Followers
37
Votes
75
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Python
  • 21
    Simple
  • 5
    Installation feedback for Twitter App Cards
  • 5
    Low learning curve, from bash script to Python power
  • 3
    Easy on maintainance
Pros
  • 4
    Keeps code style consistent adheres to strict standard
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Fabric, StyleCI?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana