Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Famo.us vs T3: What are the differences?
Developers describe Famo.us as "A JavaScript framework for everyone who wants to build beautiful experiences on any device". Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript. On the other hand, T3 is detailed as "Client-side JavaScript framework for building large-scale web applications, created by Box". T3 is different than most JavaScript frameworks. It's meant to be a small piece of an overall architecture that allows you to build scalable client-side code. T3 is explicitly not an MVC framework. It's a framework that allows the creation of loosely-coupled components while letting you decide what other pieces you need for your web application. You can use T3 with other frameworks like Backbone or React, or you can use T3 by itself.
Famo.us and T3 belong to "Javascript UI Libraries" category of the tech stack.
Famo.us and T3 are both open source tools. Famo.us with 6.48K GitHub stars and 765 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than T3 with 1.59K GitHub stars and 160 GitHub forks.
Pros of Famo.us
- Speedy as native apps14
- Future11
- WebGL9
- Javascript9
- Components6
- 3D physics engine6
- Open source6
- Performance5
- Rendering Engine for the Web5
- Runs on Android4
- Works with Angular3
- Works with Meteor3
- Runs on iOS3
- Great for mobile apps3
- Works with Backbone2
- Works with React2
- Replaces the need for native app development2
- FRP1