StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. fancybox vs react-three-fiber

fancybox vs react-three-fiber

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

fancybox
fancybox
Stacks5.4K
Followers104
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks1.8K
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber
Stacks52
Followers46
Votes0

fancybox vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will explore the key differences between fancybox and react-three-fiber in a website context.

  1. 1. Rendering Technology: Fancybox is a JavaScript library that provides a lightbox-style display for media. It utilizes jQuery and CSS to create interactive pop-up boxes. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is a React renderer for creating 3D graphics and animations. It leverages WebGL and Three.js under the hood to produce realistic 3D scenes.

  2. 2. Purpose: Fancybox focuses on enhancing the user experience by presenting images, videos, or other media in a visually pleasing lightbox format. It is mainly used for displaying content in a layer above the current page. React-three-fiber, on the other hand, is primarily designed for building immersive 3D websites or applications, where the main focus is rendering and manipulating 3D objects in a virtual environment.

  3. 3. Dependency: Fancybox depends on jQuery, which is a separate JavaScript library. This means that you need to include both Fancybox and jQuery scripts in your project for it to work correctly. In contrast, react-three-fiber is a standalone React library that doesn't rely on any external dependencies. It leverages the power of React and Three.js to create 3D scenes directly within a React component.

  4. 4. Integration with Framework: Fancybox can be used with any web framework that supports jQuery, as it is not tightly integrated with any specific framework. It can be easily added to an existing project by including the necessary scripts and initializing Fancybox on relevant elements. In contrast, react-three-fiber is built specifically for React and integrates seamlessly with the React component architecture. It follows the declarative nature of React and allows you to create and manipulate 3D scenes using React components.

  5. 5. Learning Curve: Fancybox has a relatively low learning curve, especially for developers familiar with jQuery. It provides a simple and straightforward API for displaying media in a lightbox format. React-three-fiber, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, as it requires familiarity with React and Three.js concepts. It involves understanding React components, hooks, and the Three.js rendering pipeline.

  6. 6. Application Scenarios: Fancybox is commonly used in situations where you want to display images, galleries, videos, or other media in an overlay format. It is useful for showcasing media content without navigating away from the current page. React-three-fiber is more suitable for creating complex 3D scenes and interactive experiences. It is often utilized in gaming, architectural visualization, data visualization, or any other scenario where 3D elements play a central role.

In summary, Fancybox is a JavaScript library for creating lightbox-style displays primarily focused on media content, whereas react-three-fiber is a React renderer for building immersive and interactive 3D scenes leveraging WebGL and Three.js. The key differences lie in the rendering technology, purpose, dependency, framework integration, learning curve, and application scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

fancybox
fancybox
react-three-fiber
react-three-fiber

It is a tool that offers a nice and elegant way to add zooming functionality for images, html content and multi-media on your webpages. It is built on the top of the popular JavaScript framework jQuery and is both easy to implement and a snap to customize.

It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.

Looks great on every device; Swipe to navigate, spread/pinch to zoom in/out supported on touch devices;Supports most popular sites as YouTube, Vimeo and Google maps out of the box;It is possible to open a modal while another is still visible
React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
5.4K
Stacks
52
Followers
104
Followers
46
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
Google Maps
Google Maps
CSS 3
CSS 3
JavaScript
JavaScript
jQuery
jQuery
React
React
three.js
three.js

What are some alternatives to fancybox, react-three-fiber?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Panda3D

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase