StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Fastify vs Restify

Fastify vs Restify

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Restify
Restify
Stacks86
Followers129
Votes1
Fastify
Fastify
Stacks503
Followers523
Votes95
GitHub Stars34.9K
Forks2.5K

Fastify vs Restify: What are the differences?

Introduction

Fastify and Restify are two popular frameworks used for building web applications. While they both have similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Routing and Middleware: One key difference between Fastify and Restify is in how they handle routing and middleware. Fastify uses a plugin-based architecture that allows for easy integration of third-party plugins, while Restify has a built-in routing and middleware system. This means that Fastify provides more flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility.

  2. Performance: Fastify is known for its exceptional performance, as it is built using Node.js core modules. It uses an asynchronous, non-blocking approach which allows for high throughput and low response times. On the other hand, Restify has a simpler architecture and is optimized for handling RESTful APIs, making it a good choice for simpler, lightweight applications.

  3. Error Handling: Fastify and Restify have different approaches when it comes to error handling. Fastify provides a powerful error handling mechanism that allows for detailed error reporting and logging. It also supports user-defined error handling functions. Restify, on the other hand, provides a simpler error handling mechanism that is focused on returning standardized error responses.

  4. Validation: Fastify has built-in support for request validation and serialization using JSON Schema. It provides a declarative way to define request and response payloads, making it easier to validate and transform data. Restify, on the other hand, does not have built-in validation support and requires additional libraries or manual validation code.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Fastify has a growing community and a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It is actively maintained and has a large number of contributors. This means that there is a wide range of functionality and third-party integrations available for Fastify. Restify, on the other hand, has a smaller community and ecosystem, although it still has a dedicated user base.

  6. Use Cases: Due to its lightweight and high-performance nature, Fastify is a good choice for building high-traffic web applications or APIs that require low latency and high throughput. It is well-suited for microservices architectures. Restify, on the other hand, is designed specifically for building RESTful APIs and is a good fit for simple, lightweight applications that do not require advanced features or high performance.

In summary, Fastify and Restify have different architectural approaches and cater to different use cases. Fastify provides more flexibility, performance, and advanced features, making it a good choice for high-performance web applications and microservices. Restify, on the other hand, is focused on simplicity and building RESTful APIs for simpler applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Restify
Restify
Fastify
Fastify

A Node.js web service framework optimized for building semantically correct RESTful web services ready for production use at scale. it optimizes for introspection and performance.

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

-
100% asynchronous: all the core is implemented with asynchronous code, in this way not even a millisecond is wasted.;Highly performant: as far as we know, Fastify is one of the fastest web frameworks in town, depending on the code complexity we can serve up to 20000 request per second.;Extendible: Fastify is fully extensible via its hooks, plugins and decorators.;Schema based: even if it is not mandatory we recommend to use JSON Schema to validate your routes and serialize your outputs, internally Fastify compiles the schema in an highly performant function.;Logging: logs are extremely important but are costly; we chose the best logger to almost remove this cost, Pino!;Developer friendly: the framework is built to be very expressive and help the developer in his daily use, without sacrificing performance and security.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
34.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
86
Stacks
503
Followers
129
Followers
523
Votes
1
Votes
95
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Semantically REST correctness
Pros
  • 21
    Performance
  • 13
    Easy to use
  • 12
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Middleware
  • 9
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Small community
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Restify, Fastify?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase