Faust vs JUCE

Overview

JUCE

Stacks39

Followers74

Votes10

Faust

Stacks26

Followers80

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.8K

Forks536

Faust vs JUCE: What are the differences?

< Faust and JUCE are both powerful and popular audio programming languages used in the music and audio production industry. They have key differences that set them apart from each other.>

Graphical User Interface (GUI): One major difference between Faust and JUCE is that JUCE provides comprehensive tools for creating GUI components within the audio applications, making it easier for developers to design user-friendly interfaces. On the other hand, Faust focuses more on the underlying audio processing algorithms and does not offer built-in support for GUI creation.
Programming Paradigm: Faust is primarily a functional programming language specifically designed for audio signal processing, focusing on creating efficient and optimized signal processing code. In contrast, JUCE follows an object-oriented programming paradigm, offering a wider range of functionalities beyond audio processing, such as graphics rendering and cross-platform development.
Compilation and Integration: Faust uses its compiler to generate optimized C++ code, which can then be integrated into existing projects easily. On the other hand, JUCE provides a complete framework for developing cross-platform applications, including audio plugins, with built-in support for various platforms like iOS, Android, and web.
Community and Ecosystem: JUCE has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. Faust, although popular in academic and research circles, may have a smaller community but offers unique features tailored specifically for audio processing tasks.

In Summary, Faust and JUCE differ in their approach to GUI development, programming paradigms, compilation methods, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences in audio programming.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JUCE	Faust
It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.	It is a stream processing library, porting the ideas from Kafka Streams to Python. It provides both stream processing and event processing, sharing similarity with tools such as Kafka Streams, Apache Spark/Storm/Samza/Flink.
For desktop and mobile; Building powerful and complex applications; User Interface & Graphics; Audio & plug-ins.	Stream processing; Event processing; Build high performance distributed systems; Real-time data pipelines
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 536
Stacks 39	Stacks 26
Followers 74	Followers 80
Votes 10	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Cross platform 2 Fast 1 Pure C++ code 1 Performance 1 Open Source Cons 2 Free Edition has Made with Juce	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Android OS React Native C++ Windows macOS iOS	Python Flask Django Pandas PyTorch NumPy NLTK SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to JUCE, Faust?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Faust vs JUCE: What are the differences?

< Faust and JUCE are both powerful and popular audio programming languages used in the music and audio production industry. They have key differences that set them apart from each other.>

Graphical User Interface (GUI): One major difference between Faust and JUCE is that JUCE provides comprehensive tools for creating GUI components within the audio applications, making it easier for developers to design user-friendly interfaces. On the other hand, Faust focuses more on the underlying audio processing algorithms and does not offer built-in support for GUI creation.
Programming Paradigm: Faust is primarily a functional programming language specifically designed for audio signal processing, focusing on creating efficient and optimized signal processing code. In contrast, JUCE follows an object-oriented programming paradigm, offering a wider range of functionalities beyond audio processing, such as graphics rendering and cross-platform development.
Compilation and Integration: Faust uses its compiler to generate optimized C++ code, which can then be integrated into existing projects easily. On the other hand, JUCE provides a complete framework for developing cross-platform applications, including audio plugins, with built-in support for various platforms like iOS, Android, and web.
Community and Ecosystem: JUCE has a large and active community of developers and users, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and support forums. Faust, although popular in academic and research circles, may have a smaller community but offers unique features tailored specifically for audio processing tasks.

Faust vs JUCE

Overview