Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

FindBugs

474
100
+ 1
0
PMD

43
109
+ 1
0
Add tool

FindBugs vs PMD: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Language compatibility FindBugs is primarily designed for Java code analysis, while PMD supports multiple programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, XML, SQL, and others. This means that PMD can be used for code analysis in a wider range of projects that use different programming languages.

  2. Key difference 2: Rule sets FindBugs provides its own set of pre-defined rules for identifying common coding issues and bugs in Java code. On the other hand, PMD also offers a set of pre-defined rules, but it allows users to define their own custom rules as well. This flexibility of creating custom rule sets sets PMD apart from FindBugs.

  3. Key difference 3: Analysis approach FindBugs analyzes compiled bytecode and detects issues by examining the bytecode instructions. It performs static analysis without the need for executing the code. PMD, on the other hand, analyzes the source code directly and performs rule-based analysis on the code structure and patterns. This difference in analysis approach can result in variation in the types of issues detected by each tool.

  4. Key difference 4: IDE integration FindBugs provides direct integration with popular Java development environments, such as Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and NetBeans. It allows developers to run the analysis from within the IDE and view the results seamlessly. PMD also offers IDE integration but supports a broader range of programming languages beyond Java. Therefore, PMD's IDE integration may not be as comprehensive as FindBugs for Java-specific projects.

  5. Key difference 5: Performance FindBugs is known for its fast analysis and low overhead on resources. It is capable of analyzing large codebases efficiently. PMD, on the other hand, can be slower compared to FindBugs due to its more extensive rule-based analysis on the source code. The performance difference may vary depending on the size and complexity of the codebase being analyzed.

  6. Key difference 6: Community support and maintenance Both FindBugs and PMD have active developer communities, but FindBugs has received less active maintenance in recent years. PMD, on the other hand, has continued to receive updates, bug fixes, and new features from its community. This difference in community support and maintenance can impact the availability of new rules or bug fixes in each tool.

In summary, FindBugs and PMD differ in language compatibility, rule sets, analysis approach, IDE integration, performance, and community support. These differences make PMD a more versatile tool for code analysis across multiple programming languages, while FindBugs excels in providing efficient analysis for Java code specifically.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is FindBugs?

It detects possible bugs in Java programs. Potential errors are classified in four ranks: scariest, scary, troubling and of concern. This is a hint to the developer about their possible impact or severity.

What is PMD?

It is a source code analyzer. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use FindBugs?
What companies use PMD?
See which teams inside your own company are using FindBugs or PMD.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with FindBugs?
What tools integrate with PMD?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to FindBugs and PMD?
Checkstyle
It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.
SonarLint
It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.
SonarQube
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
CodeNarc
A flexible framework for rules, rule sets and custom rules means it's easy to configure it to fit into your project. Build tool, framework support, and report generation are all enterprise ready.
ESLint
A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
See all alternatives