StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Firebase Cloud Messaging vs SignalR

Firebase Cloud Messaging vs SignalR

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SignalR
SignalR
Stacks656
Followers1.2K
Votes146
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.3K
Firebase Cloud Messaging
Firebase Cloud Messaging
Stacks284
Followers389
Votes18

Firebase Cloud Messaging vs SignalR: What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Cloud Messaging and SignalR are both widely used tools for real-time messaging and notification delivery in web and mobile applications. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Network Connection: Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) utilizes the WebSocket protocol to establish a persistent connection between the server and the client, allowing for real-time communication. On the other hand, SignalR relies on various communication mechanisms such as WebSockets, Long Polling, Server-Sent Events (SSE), and others, providing more flexibility in terms of network connectivity.

  2. Platform Support: FCM is primarily designed for mobile platforms, including Android and iOS, with support for web applications as well. In contrast, SignalR is a cross-platform technology that can be used in web, mobile, and desktop applications, making it more versatile in terms of platform support.

  3. Real-Time Communication: FCM is mainly focused on delivering notifications and messages to mobile devices. It provides a reliable and scalable infrastructure for sending push notifications to targeted devices. On the other hand, SignalR is designed to enable real-time bidirectional communication between the server and the client, allowing for instant updates and synchronization of data.

  4. Ease of Use: FCM provides a simple and straightforward API for sending push notifications and messages, making it easier for developers to integrate into their applications. It also provides various handy features like topic messaging, device grouping, and notification analytics. SignalR, on the other hand, requires more involved setup and configuration, as it involves building hubs, managing connections, and handling events for real-time communication.

  5. Scalability: FCM is backed by Google's robust infrastructure, ensuring high scalability and reliability for message delivery. It can handle a massive number of devices and provides efficient targeting options for sending notifications. SignalR relies on the underlying infrastructure of the application hosting environment, which may require additional configuration and resources to handle large-scale real-time communication.

  6. Extensibility: SignalR offers more flexibility and extensibility compared to FCM. It allows developers to customize and extend the functionality of the hub by implementing their own event handling, authentication, and authorization logic. FCM, on the other hand, has a more limited set of features and customization options.

In summary, Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) is primarily focused on delivering push notifications to mobile devices and provides an easy-to-use infrastructure optimized for scalability and reliability. On the other hand, SignalR enables real-time bidirectional communication across various platforms, providing more flexibility and extensibility but requiring more configuration and development effort.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SignalR
SignalR
Firebase Cloud Messaging
Firebase Cloud Messaging

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

It is a cross-platform messaging solution that lets you reliably deliver messages at no cost. You can notify a client app that new email or other data is available to sync. You can send notification messages to drive user re-engagement and retention. For use cases such as instant messaging, a message can transfer a payload of up to 4KB to a client app.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
656
Stacks
284
Followers
1.2K
Followers
389
Votes
146
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
Pros
  • 18
    Free
Cons
  • 8
    Lack of BI tools
Integrations
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to SignalR, Firebase Cloud Messaging?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

OneSignal

OneSignal

OneSignal is a high volume push notification service for websites and mobile applications. OneSignal supports all major native and mobile platforms by providing dedicated SDKs for each platform, a RESTful server API, and a dashboard.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase