Firebase vs SignalR vs Socket.IO

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Firebase

22.5K
18.5K
+ 1
1.9K
SignalR

330
779
+ 1
81
Socket.IO

7.5K
6.1K
+ 1
761
Pros of Firebase
Pros of SignalR
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 357
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 261
    Fast and responsive
  • 233
    Easy setup
  • 206
    Real-time
  • 184
    JSON
  • 126
    Free
  • 120
    Backed by google
  • 80
    Angular adaptor
  • 62
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 25
    Great documentation
  • 22
    Real-time synchronization
  • 19
    Mobile friendly
  • 17
    Rapid prototyping
  • 12
    Great security
  • 10
    Automatic scaling
  • 9
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 5
    Firebase hosting
  • 5
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Great
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Speed of light
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    .net
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Push notification
  • 16
    Supports .NET server
  • 13
    Real-time
  • 11
    Free
  • 10
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 9
    WebSockets
  • 7
    JSON
  • 6
    Simple
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Cool
  • 1
    Ease of use
  • 209
    Real-time
  • 140
    Event-based communication
  • 139
    Node.js
  • 101
    Open source
  • 99
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 22
    No internet dependency
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 7
    Large community
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 4
    Push notification

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Firebase
Cons of SignalR
Cons of Socket.IO
  • 25
    Can become expensive
  • 14
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 14
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 5
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No Relational Data
  • 1
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Expertise hard to get
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
  • 9
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 2
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Small community

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Firebase?

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

What is SignalR?

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

What is Socket.IO?

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Firebase?
What companies use SignalR?
What companies use Socket.IO?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Firebase?
What tools integrate with SignalR?
What tools integrate with Socket.IO?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitNode.jsFirebase+5
7
1479
What are some alternatives to Firebase, SignalR, and Socket.IO?
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Parse
With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.
Heroku
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
Auth0
A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
Realm
The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.
See all alternatives
Interest over time
How much does Firebase cost?
How much does SignalR cost?
How much does Socket.IO cost?
Pricing unavailable
Pricing unavailable
News about SignalR
More news
News about Socket.IO
More news