StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Flutter vs Visual Studio App Center

Flutter vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flutter
Flutter
Stacks17.7K
Followers16.8K
Votes1.2K
GitHub Stars173.7K
Forks29.4K
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

Flutter vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Introduction Flutter and Visual Studio App Center are two popular technologies used for mobile app development. While Flutter is a framework for building cross-platform mobile applications, Visual Studio App Center is a continuous integration and delivery platform for mobile app developers. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Programming Language: Flutter uses Dart as its programming language, which is a modern language developed by Google. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center supports multiple programming languages like Swift, Objective-C, Java, and Xamarin.

  2. Cross-platform Support: Flutter is known for its excellent cross-platform support, allowing developers to write code once and deploy it on both iOS and Android platforms. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, provides support for building native apps for iOS, Android, and Windows platforms separately.

  3. UI Development: Flutter comes with its own set of widgets and a rich UI framework, allowing developers to create visually appealing and highly customizable user interfaces. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, focuses more on providing tools for continuous integration and delivery, rather than UI development.

  4. Testing and Analytics: Visual Studio App Center offers robust testing capabilities, including automated UI testing, device testing, and crash reporting. It also provides valuable analytics and insights about user engagement and usage patterns. While Flutter also offers testing capabilities, it may require additional tools and frameworks for comprehensive testing and analytics.

  5. Integration with Development Tools: Flutter integrates well with popular IDEs like Android Studio, Visual Studio Code, and IntelliJ IDEA. It also has a rich set of development tools and plugins that enhance the development experience. Visual Studio App Center, on the other hand, is integrated with Microsoft's Visual Studio IDE, making it a preferred choice for developers already using Visual Studio for their development workflow.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Flutter has a growing community and a vibrant ecosystem of packages, libraries, and resources that support and enhance its functionality. Visual Studio App Center, being a product of Microsoft, has strong community and ecosystem support, including documentation, forums, and community-driven resources.

In summary, Flutter is a cross-platform mobile app development framework with its own UI framework and excellent cross-platform support, while Visual Studio App Center is a continuous integration and delivery platform with support for multiple programming languages and a focus on testing and analytics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flutter, Visual Studio App Center

Nick
Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k
Comments
Thuan
Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided
  • Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
  • Easy to learn & deployed production
  • Fast development
  • Strong community
  • Completed Documents
  • Native performance with lower RAM used.
  • Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
  • Powered by Facebook.
666k views666k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flutter
Flutter
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
17.7K
Stacks
113
Followers
16.8K
Followers
232
Votes
1.2K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Hot Reload
  • 126
    Cross platform
  • 107
    Performance
  • 90
    Backed by Google
  • 74
    Compiled into Native Code
Cons
  • 29
    Need to learn Dart
  • 11
    Lack of community support
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 8
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
Pros
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
  • 1
    Slack integration
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
Firebase
Firebase
Dart
Dart
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Flutter, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase