StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Galen vs Serenade

Galen vs Serenade

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Galen
Galen
Stacks11
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks163
Serenade
Serenade
Stacks2
Followers15
Votes0

Galen vs Serenade: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When comparing Galen and Serenade, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two automation testing tools to determine which one suits your needs best.


## 1. Integration with Development Tools:
Galen offers better integration with popular development tools like GitHub, JIRA, and Slack, allowing seamless collaboration with development teams. On the other hand, Serenade lacks such extensive integration, which may limit its efficiency in a collaborative development environment.


## 2. Scripting Language:
Galen uses its proprietary syntax for scripting tests, providing a specific structure for writing test cases. In contrast, Serenade supports multiple scripting languages like Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript, offering more flexibility in test script creation and execution.


## 3. Test Case Execution Speed:
Serenade boasts faster test case execution speed compared to Galen, which can significantly reduce the overall testing time, especially in larger projects with extensive test suites.


## 4. Browser Support:
While both Galen and Serenade support multiple browsers for testing web applications, Galen provides more comprehensive browser compatibility, ensuring consistent testing results across various browser environments.


## 5. Visual Testing Capabilities:
Galen specializes in visual testing, offering robust features for layout and design validation, making it a preferred choice for projects that heavily rely on visual elements. In contrast, Serenade focuses more on functional testing aspects, with limited visual testing capabilities.


## 6. Community Support:
Galen has a larger and more active community compared to Serenade, which translates to better community-driven resources, plugins, and support for users looking to enhance their testing experience through community contributions.


In Summary, the key differences between Galen and Serenade lie in their integration with development tools, scripting languages, test case execution speed, browser support, visual testing capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Galen
Galen
Serenade
Serenade

It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout

It is the fastest way to write code with natural speech. Rather than memorizing keyboard shortcuts and language syntax, it enables you to write code with commands like "create function" and "delete argument".

Responsive; Cross-browser layout testing; Functional testing
Supports macOS, Windows, and Linux; Write code using natural speech
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
163
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11
Stacks
2
Followers
14
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Java
Java
Selenium
Selenium
C#
C#
Python
Python
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Java
Java
Atom
Atom
Sass
Sass
TypeScript
TypeScript
Kotlin
Kotlin
PyCharm
PyCharm

What are some alternatives to Galen, Serenade?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Telosys

Telosys

It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp