StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Galen vs Telosys

Galen vs Telosys

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Galen
Galen
Stacks11
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks163
Telosys
Telosys
Stacks12
Followers16
Votes44
GitHub Stars179
Forks26

Galen vs Telosys: What are the differences?

Galen: Automated testing of responsive design and html layout for web applications. It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout; Telosys: Open Source code generator for any languages and frameworks. It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

Galen belongs to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack, while Telosys can be primarily classified under "Code Automation Tools".

Some of the features offered by Galen are:

  • Responsive
  • Cross-browser layout testing
  • Functional testing

On the other hand, Telosys provides the following key features:

  • Totally free and open source
  • Models and templates management
  • Code generation

Galen and Telosys are both open source tools. Galen with 1.36K GitHub stars and 142 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Telosys with 45 GitHub stars and 12 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Galen
Galen
Telosys
Telosys

It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout

It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

Responsive; Cross-browser layout testing; Functional testing
Totally free and open source; Models and templates management; Code generation; Batch mode; Project booster
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Stars
179
GitHub Forks
163
GitHub Forks
26
Stacks
11
Stacks
12
Followers
14
Followers
16
Votes
0
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Can generate any type of language
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Simple and light
  • 4
    Easy setup
Integrations
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Java
Java
Selenium
Selenium
C#
C#
PHP
PHP
JavaScript
JavaScript
Vue.js
Vue.js
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
C#
C#
Spring
Spring
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
TypeScript
TypeScript

What are some alternatives to Galen, Telosys?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp