Ganglia vs Zabbix

Overview

Ganglia

Stacks27

Followers88

Votes0

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Ganglia vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Ganglia vs Zabbix

Ganglia and Zabbix are monitoring systems commonly used to collect and analyze data from various resources in a computer network. While both tools serve the same purpose, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases.

Ease of Deployment: Ganglia is known for its simplicity in terms of deployment as it uses a decentralized architecture. The monitoring nodes in Ganglia can be easily added or removed without affecting the overall system. On the other hand, Zabbix has a more centralized architecture which requires a dedicated server for deployment, making it more complex to set up and maintain.
Scalability: Ganglia is well-suited for large-scale environments as it can support a high number of nodes and metrics. It utilizes efficient multicast and unicast communication protocols to handle large amounts of data across a distributed system. Zabbix, on the other hand, is more suitable for small to medium-sized environments due to its centralized design. It may face scalability challenges when dealing with a large number of nodes or metrics.
Real-time Monitoring: Ganglia excels in providing real-time monitoring capabilities. It leverages a hierarchical design and a modular approach to achieve low-latency data collection and reporting. This makes it ideal for scenarios where real-time data visualization and analysis are critical. On the contrary, Zabbix focuses more on historical data analysis and trend prediction rather than real-time monitoring, making it better suited for long-term analysis and planning.
Alerting and Notification: Zabbix offers a robust alerting and notification system that allows users to set up and customize triggers based on specific conditions. It can send alerts through various channels such as email, SMS, and instant messaging, ensuring timely response to critical events. While Ganglia provides basic alerting capabilities, it lacks the comprehensive alerting features and flexibility that Zabbix offers.
User Interface: Zabbix provides a feature-rich and intuitive web interface that offers a wide range of visualizations, graphs, and reporting tools. It allows users to create custom dashboards and drill down into specific metrics for detailed analysis. Ganglia, on the other hand, has a simpler and more lightweight web interface, focusing primarily on visualizing and aggregating metrics rather than providing advanced reporting and customization options.
Ecosystem and Integration: Zabbix has a larger and more active community, resulting in a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other systems. This enables seamless integration with popular third-party tools and services, such as ticketing systems, version control systems, and cloud platforms. Ganglia, although it has a smaller community, also offers integration capabilities but may not have the same extensive support as Zabbix.

In summary, Ganglia and Zabbix differ in terms of deployment simplicity, scalability, real-time monitoring capabilities, alerting and notification system, user interface features, and ecosystem and integration options. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the organization or system being monitored.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ganglia, Zabbix

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ganglia	Zabbix
It is a scalable distributed monitoring system for high-performance computing systems such as clusters and Grids. It is based on a hierarchical design targeted at federations of clusters.	Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.
-	Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 27	Stacks 684
Followers 88	Followers 981
Votes 0	Votes 66
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com

What are some alternatives to Ganglia, Zabbix?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Ganglia vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Ganglia vs Zabbix

Ease of Deployment: Ganglia is known for its simplicity in terms of deployment as it uses a decentralized architecture. The monitoring nodes in Ganglia can be easily added or removed without affecting the overall system. On the other hand, Zabbix has a more centralized architecture which requires a dedicated server for deployment, making it more complex to set up and maintain.
Scalability: Ganglia is well-suited for large-scale environments as it can support a high number of nodes and metrics. It utilizes efficient multicast and unicast communication protocols to handle large amounts of data across a distributed system. Zabbix, on the other hand, is more suitable for small to medium-sized environments due to its centralized design. It may face scalability challenges when dealing with a large number of nodes or metrics.
Real-time Monitoring: Ganglia excels in providing real-time monitoring capabilities. It leverages a hierarchical design and a modular approach to achieve low-latency data collection and reporting. This makes it ideal for scenarios where real-time data visualization and analysis are critical. On the contrary, Zabbix focuses more on historical data analysis and trend prediction rather than real-time monitoring, making it better suited for long-term analysis and planning.
Alerting and Notification: Zabbix offers a robust alerting and notification system that allows users to set up and customize triggers based on specific conditions. It can send alerts through various channels such as email, SMS, and instant messaging, ensuring timely response to critical events. While Ganglia provides basic alerting capabilities, it lacks the comprehensive alerting features and flexibility that Zabbix offers.
User Interface: Zabbix provides a feature-rich and intuitive web interface that offers a wide range of visualizations, graphs, and reporting tools. It allows users to create custom dashboards and drill down into specific metrics for detailed analysis. Ganglia, on the other hand, has a simpler and more lightweight web interface, focusing primarily on visualizing and aggregating metrics rather than providing advanced reporting and customization options.
Ecosystem and Integration: Zabbix has a larger and more active community, resulting in a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations with other systems. This enables seamless integration with popular third-party tools and services, such as ticketing systems, version control systems, and cloud platforms. Ganglia, although it has a smaller community, also offers integration capabilities but may not have the same extensive support as Zabbix.

Ganglia vs Zabbix

Overview

Ganglia vs Zabbix: What are the differences?