Gatling vs Loader.io vs Locust

Overview

Loader.io

Stacks71

Followers173

Votes18

Gatling

Stacks244

Followers318

Votes21

GitHub Stars6.8K

Forks1.2K

Locust

Stacks191

Followers317

Votes51

GitHub Stars27.0K

Forks3.1K

Gatling vs Loader.io vs Locust: What are the differences?

1. **Protocol Support**: Gatling supports HTTP, WebSockets, and JMS protocols, whereas Loader.io focuses primarily on HTTP and HTTPS protocols and Locust mainly concentrates on HTTP protocol. 2. **Architecture**: Gatling is a Scala-based tool with a high level of concurrency and scalability, Loader.io is a cloud-based load testing service, and Locust is a Python-based load testing tool that allows writing test cases in Python code. 3. **Ease of Use**: Gatling has a steep learning curve due to its complex DSL language, while Loader.io offers a user-friendly interface for quick and easy setup, and Locust provides a simple and intuitive way to write test scenarios using Python code. 4. **Reporting**: Gatling generates detailed and comprehensive reports with graphs and statistics, Loader.io provides basic reports and real-time monitoring, and Locust offers simple HTML reports. 5. **Cost**: Gatling is an open-source tool with no licensing costs, Loader.io offers free and paid plans based on test credits, and Locust is open-source with no licensing fees. 6. **Community Support**: Gatling has a large and active community with extensive documentation and forums, Loader.io has limited community support, and Locust has a growing community and resources.

In Summary, Gatling, Loader.io, and Locust differ in protocol support, architecture, ease of use, reporting capabilities, cost, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Loader.io, Gatling, Locust

Rashmi

Mar 17, 2021

Needs adviceon

Jenkins

Gatling

Locust

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

104k views104k

Comments

Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Gatling

Locust

Flood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k

Comments

Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Loader.io	Gatling	Locust
Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.	Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.	Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
Share Graphs and Stats- anytime, anywhere;GUI or API- load test how you want	Simulating heavy traffic; Load testing as code for CI/CD integration & automation; API Load testing; Automated deployment of load injectors; Response times reports	Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.8K	GitHub Stars 27.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 3.1K
Stacks 71	Stacks 244	Stacks 191
Followers 173	Followers 318	Followers 317
Votes 18	Votes 21	Votes 51
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Easy to use 6 Free tier 3 Heroku add-on	Pros 6 Great detailed reports 5 Loadrunner 5 Can run in cluster mode 3 Scala based 2 Load test as code Cons 2 Steep Learning Curve 1 Hard to test non-supported protocols 0 Not distributed	Pros 15 Hackable 11 Supports distributed 7 Open source 6 Easy to setup 6 Easy to use Cons 1 Bad design
Integrations
cloudControl	No integrations available	Python

What are some alternatives to Loader.io, Gatling, Locust?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

LoadNinja

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Ddosify

It is a high-performance load testing tool, written in Golang. It is currently supporting HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2. Other protocols are on the way.

Related Comparisons

Gatling vs Loader.io vs Locust: What are the differences?

In Summary, Gatling, Loader.io, and Locust differ in protocol support, architecture, ease of use, reporting capabilities, cost, and community support.

Gatling vs Loader.io vs Locust

Overview