Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Gatling vs Solr: What are the differences?
# Introduction
In this Markdown document, we will compare the key differences between Gatling and Solr, specifically highlighting their distinctive characteristics in a concise manner.
1. **Purpose**: Gatling is primarily used for load testing and performance monitoring of web applications, while Solr is a search platform built on Apache Lucene and is utilized for full-text searching, hit highlighting, and faceted search.
2. **Functionality**: Gatling simulates virtual users to generate traffic on web applications to test performance under different scenarios, whereas Solr is focused on indexing and searching large volumes of textual data quickly and efficiently, providing relevant search results.
3. **Use Cases**: Gatling is commonly employed by developers and quality assurance teams to measure the performance of web applications and identify bottlenecks, whereas Solr is integrated into various systems such as e-commerce platforms, content management systems, and document repositories to enhance search capabilities.
4. **Architecture**: Gatling follows a distributed, asynchronous, and non-blocking design to efficiently simulate thousands of concurrent users, while Solr utilizes Apache Lucene's inverted indexing and search algorithms to deliver fast and accurate results.
5. **Scalability**: Gatling can scale horizontally by adding more virtual user instances across multiple machines to simulate large user loads, whereas Solr can be scaled both vertically by increasing resources on a single machine and horizontally by distributing index shards across multiple nodes for improved search performance.
6. **Community and Support**: Gatling has a vibrant open-source community with active development and regular updates, offering extensive documentation and user forums for assistance, while Solr is backed by the Apache Software Foundation, providing robust support, tutorials, and resources for users leveraging its search capabilities.
In Summary, the key differences between Gatling and Solr lie in their distinct purposes, functionalities, use cases, architectures, scalability options, and community support structures, catering to diverse needs in the realms of load testing and search indexing, respectively.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Gatling
Pros of Solr
Pros of Gatling
- Great detailed reports6
- Can run in cluster mode5
- Loadrunner5
- Scala based3
- Load test as code2
- Faster0
Pros of Solr
- Powerful35
- Indexing and searching22
- Scalable20
- Customizable19
- Enterprise Ready13
- Restful5
- Apache Software Foundation5
- Great Search engine4
- Security built-in2
- Easy Operating1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gatling
Cons of Solr
Cons of Gatling
- Steep Learning Curve2
- Hard to test non-supported protocols1
- Not distributed0
Cons of Solr
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
1.7K
174
20.6K
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Gatling?
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance.
Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.
What is Solr?
Solr is the popular, blazing fast open source enterprise search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, near real-time indexing, dynamic clustering, database integration, rich document (e.g., Word, PDF) handling, and geospatial search. Solr is highly reliable, scalable and fault tolerant, providing distributed indexing, replication and load-balanced querying, automated failover and recovery, centralized configuration and more. Solr powers the search and navigation features of many of the world's largest internet sites.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Gatling?
What companies use Solr?
What companies use Gatling?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Gatling?
What tools integrate with Solr?
What tools integrate with Solr?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to Gatling and Solr?
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
BlazeMeter
Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
Locust
Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
k6
It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.
Cucumber
Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.