StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Load Testing
  4. Load And Performance Testing
  5. Gatling vs Swagger UI

Gatling vs Swagger UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gatling
Gatling
Stacks244
Followers318
Votes21
GitHub Stars6.8K
Forks1.2K
Swagger UI
Swagger UI
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes207
GitHub Stars28.3K
Forks9.2K

Gatling vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

  1. Protocol Support: In Gatling, it primarily focuses on protocol-level testing, providing support for HTTP, JMS, and WebSocket protocols. On the other hand, Swagger UI is a tool for API documentation and exploration, allowing users to interact with HTTP APIs using a web interface.

  2. Performance Testing vs API Documentation: Gatling is designed for performance testing and load testing scenarios, where it helps in simulating virtual users to test the application's performance under various conditions. In contrast, Swagger UI is used for API documentation, enabling developers to understand, visualize, and interact with APIs without the need for additional tools.

  3. Scripting Language: Gatling utilizes Scala as its scripting language, allowing users to write performance test scripts in a concise and expressive manner. Swagger UI, on the other hand, generates documentation from OpenAPI Specification (formerly known as Swagger Specification), which is written in JSON or YAML format.

  4. Graphical User Interface: Gatling is a command-line based tool, providing a scripting environment for users to create and execute performance test scripts. In comparison, Swagger UI offers a graphical web interface where users can explore API endpoints, test API requests, and view API documentation in an interactive format.

In Summary, Gatling focuses on performance testing with support for various protocols and a scripting language, while Swagger UI is primarily used for API documentation and exploration with a graphical user interface for interacting with HTTP APIs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gatling, Swagger UI

StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments
Vrashab
Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceonGatlingGatlingLocustLocustFlood IOFlood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k
Comments
Aravinth
Aravinth

SSE

Nov 19, 2019

Needs advice

I want to do performance testing with HTTP protocol but the test script should be java script. For now, I kept "Artillery" and "K6" tools in my queue. Did you guys have any idea about this? Is there any tools which support Test script language: JavaScript Protocol: Http/web service Must Feature: Record OS: Mac os/windows

84.4k views84.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gatling
Gatling
Swagger UI
Swagger UI

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Simulating heavy traffic; Load testing as code for CI/CD integration & automation; API Load testing; Automated deployment of load injectors; Response times reports
The UI works in any development environment, be it locally or in the web;Allow end developers to effortlessly interact and try out every single operation your API exposes for easy consumption;Quickly find and work with resources and endpoints with neatly categorized documentation;Cater to every possible scenario with Swagger UI working in all major browsers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.8K
GitHub Stars
28.3K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
244
Stacks
2.1K
Followers
318
Followers
1.8K
Votes
21
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
Cons
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed
Pros
  • 49
    Open Source
  • 34
    Can execute api calls from the documentation
  • 29
    Free to use
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 14
    Easy to implement in .Net
Cons
  • 3
    Need to learn YAML and RAML
  • 2
    Documentation doesn't look that good
  • 1
    You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
  • 1
    Does not support hypermedia
  • 1
    Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Git
Git
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Gatling, Swagger UI?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Read the Docs

Read the Docs

It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

Gelato.io

Gelato.io

Gelato.io is a SaaS tool for creating API documentation and developer portals.

MireDot

MireDot

Generate REST documentation directly from your Java source code. This ensures always up-to-date and accurate documentation with minimal effort.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope