StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Engines
  5. Gatsby vs MkDocs

Gatsby vs MkDocs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MkDocs
MkDocs
Stacks167
Followers152
Votes14
Gatsby
Gatsby
Stacks3.3K
Followers2.4K
Votes121
GitHub Stars55.9K
Forks10.3K

Gatsby vs MkDocs: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Gatsby and MkDocs:

1. **Architecture**: Gatsby is a React-based static site generator that uses GraphQL to pull data from different sources, while MkDocs is a static site generator focused on creating project documentation using Markdown files.

2. **Themes and Templates**: Gatsby offers a wide range of themes and templates that can be customized for building various types of websites, whereas MkDocs provides a more simplistic and straightforward approach with limited theme options specifically tailored for documentation.

3. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Gatsby has a robust plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend and enhance the functionality of their websites, while MkDocs generally relies on a smaller set of plugins mainly focused on documentation features.

4. **Performance**: Gatsby is optimized for performance, providing features like code splitting, lazy loading, and image optimization out of the box, resulting in faster websites. MkDocs, on the other hand, is efficient for generating documentation but may not offer the same level of performance optimization.

5. **Community and Support**: Gatsby has a large and active community that continually contributes to the development and improvement of the platform, offering extensive resources and documentation. MkDocs, while widely used for documentation projects, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support and customization.

6. **Learning Curve**: Gatsby's use of React and GraphQL might present a steeper learning curve compared to MkDocs, which relies on Markdown files and a simpler configuration setup, making it easier for beginners to start building documentation websites quickly.

In Summary, Gatsby and MkDocs differ in their architecture, themes and templates, plugin ecosystem, performance optimization, community and support, and learning curve for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MkDocs, Gatsby

Manuel
Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MkDocs
MkDocs
Gatsby
Gatsby

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
55.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.3K
Stacks
167
Stacks
3.3K
Followers
152
Followers
2.4K
Votes
14
Votes
121
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
Cons
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
Pros
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Reusable components (React)
Cons
  • 7
    No ssr
  • 4
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 2
    Flash of unstyled content issues
  • 2
    For-profit
Integrations
No integrations available
WordPress
WordPress
TypeScript
TypeScript
GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Babel
Babel
prismic.io
prismic.io
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify
Glamorous
Glamorous
Prisma
Prisma
styled-components
styled-components
Emotion
Emotion

What are some alternatives to MkDocs, Gatsby?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope