StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Hosted Package Repository
  5. Gemfury vs GitLab

Gemfury vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gemfury
Gemfury
Stacks21
Followers23
Votes6
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Gemfury vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Gemfury and GitLab, two popular platforms in the realm of software development and deployment.

  1. Storage and Hosting: Gemfury provides private cloud storage for packages and gems, allowing users to store and share their data securely. On the other hand, GitLab is primarily a web-based Git repository manager that offers code hosting, issue tracking, CI/CD pipelines, and more.

  2. Focus on Package Management: Gemfury is specialized in package management, which includes Rubygems, NPM, PyPI, Debian packages, and more. In contrast, GitLab offers a comprehensive suite of tools for software development, collaboration, and DevOps, making it a one-stop solution for project management.

  3. Pricing Model: Gemfury operates on a subscription-based pricing model, allowing users to pay for the storage capacity they use. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a tiered pricing system based on features and the number of users, making it suitable for teams of varying sizes and needs.

  4. Version Control System: While both platforms support Git as the version control system, GitLab provides additional features such as branching, merging, file history, and code reviews integrated into its platform. Gemfury, on the other hand, focuses more on package hosting and distribution rather than extensive version control capabilities.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: GitLab boasts a large and active community of developers, contributors, and users who contribute to its open-source development. In contrast, Gemfury caters more to individual developers, small teams, and organizations looking for a specialized package management solution.

  6. Security Measures: Both Gemfury and GitLab offer security features, but GitLab provides more robust security options such as vulnerability scanning, container scanning, security dashboards, and compliance management tools to ensure the safety and integrity of development projects.

In Summary, Gemfury focuses on package management and private cloud storage, whereas GitLab offers a comprehensive suite of tools for project management, version control, and security, making it a versatile platform for software development and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gemfury, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gemfury
Gemfury
GitLab
GitLab

Hosted service for your private and custom packages to simplify your deployment story. Once you upload your packages and enable your Gemfury repository, you can securely deploy any package to any host. Your private RubyGems, Python packages, and NPM modules will be safe and within reach on Gemfury. Install them to any machine in minutes without worrying about running and securing your own private repository.<br>

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Gemfury works with RubyGems, Python packages, NPM modules, and all compatible frameworks and services.;Authenticated Repo-URL keeps your private packages safe and secure during deployment. All management and deployment is done over SSL.;Do everything you need with just a few terminal commands.;Gemfury is designed for teams. Share your account with coworkers and let them easily access your packages.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
21
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
23
Followers
54.5K
Votes
6
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Easy Integration
  • 2
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    APT repository
  • 1
    Multiple Repository Types
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Gemfury, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana