Ghost Inspector vs Webpack: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Integration with Testing Tools: Ghost Inspector is a testing tool used for automated website testing, providing features such as automated screenshot comparison and visual regression testing. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler primarily used for JavaScript applications, optimizing the bundling process for better performance.

2. Primary Functionality: Ghost Inspector focuses on automating website testing processes, ensuring that websites work as intended across different browsers and devices. In contrast, Webpack focuses on bundling and optimizing files within a web application, providing tools for code splitting and module loading.

3. Compatibility: Ghost Inspector is compatible with various testing frameworks and tools, allowing for seamless integration into existing testing workflows. Webpack, on the other hand, is specifically designed for JavaScript applications and may require additional plugins for compatibility with other languages or frameworks.

4. Deployment: Ghost Inspector is typically used in the testing phase of web development projects to automate and streamline the testing process. Webpack, on the other hand, is used in the build phase to bundle, optimize, and deploy web applications efficiently.

5. User Base: Ghost Inspector is primarily used by QA engineers and developers for automated testing, while Webpack is widely adopted by web developers working on JavaScript projects to optimize the build process and improve performance.

6. Scalability: Ghost Inspector provides features for testing multiple websites and scenarios simultaneously, allowing for scalability in testing processes. In contrast, Webpack offers scalability through code splitting and lazy loading techniques, optimizing the performance of large-scale web applications.

In Summary, Ghost Inspector is focused on automated website testing, while Webpack is a module bundler for optimizing JavaScript applications.