StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitBucket vs GitLab vs Gogs

GitBucket vs GitLab vs Gogs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
GitBucket
GitBucket
Stacks79
Followers177
Votes36
Gogs
Gogs
Stacks175
Followers306
Votes182

GitBucket vs GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitBucket, GitLab, and Gogs are three popular Git repository management systems that offer similar functionalities. However, there are key differences that set them apart. This Markdown code provides a comparison of GitBucket, GitLab, and Gogs, highlighting six specific differences.

  1. Installation and Infrastructure: GitBucket is a self-contained Java application that can be run on any Java servlet container. GitLab, on the other hand, requires a more complex installation process, as it needs a dedicated server and a compatible stack. Gogs, in comparison, is lightweight and can even run on low-end hardware.

  2. Features and Integrations: GitBucket provides basic Git repository management features, but lacks advanced functionalities such as issue tracking, integrated code review, or a built-in Wiki. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of features, including a powerful issue tracker, code review tools, and a wiki. Gogs, while not as feature-rich as GitLab, offers key functionalities such as repository management, issue tracking, and pull requests.

  3. Scalability and Performance: GitBucket is suitable for small to medium-sized projects, as it may experience performance issues with a large number of users or repositories. GitLab, with its more complex architecture, can handle larger workloads and scales better. Gogs is designed for small to medium-sized projects and is known for its fast performance, making it suitable for lightweight usage scenarios.

  4. Customization and Extensibility: GitBucket and Gogs offer limited customization options. GitBucket provides a few configuration settings, while Gogs allows for basic theming. GitLab, on the other hand, offers extensive customization options, allowing users to brand their instance and modify various aspects of its appearance and behavior.

  5. Community and Support: GitBucket has a smaller community compared to GitLab and Gogs, resulting in less online support and fewer available plugins or extensions. GitLab benefits from a large and active community, providing ample support, ongoing development, and a wide range of available extensions. Gogs has a growing community but is still smaller compared to GitLab.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: GitBucket, GitLab, and Gogs are all open-source projects and provide their software for free. GitLab offers a self-hosted version as well as a cloud-hosted option with additional features for enterprise customers. Gogs, being a lightweight and simpler alternative, is suitable for individuals or small businesses without the need for enterprise features.

In Summary, while all three platforms provide Git repository management functionality, GitBucket is lightweight and suitable for small projects, GitLab offers comprehensive features and scalability, and Gogs is a lightweight and fast alternative without extensive customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, GitBucket, Gogs

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
GitBucket
GitBucket
Gogs
Gogs

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support
Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
79
Stacks
175
Followers
54.5K
Followers
177
Followers
306
Votes
2.5K
Votes
36
Votes
182
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 8
    Self hosted
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Familiar interface
  • 5
    Simple setup
  • 5
    Scala
Pros
  • 36
    Self-hosted github like service
  • 31
    Very low memory footprint
  • 29
    Easy to install / update
  • 17
    Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi
  • 16
    Single binary deploy no dependencies

What are some alternatives to GitLab, GitBucket, Gogs?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana