StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

Β© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Gitea vs Perforce

Gitea vs Perforce

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Perforce
Perforce
Stacks83
Followers113
Votes9
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks322
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Perforce: What are the differences?

## Introduction 
In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between Gitea and Perforce, two popular version control systems used in software development.

1. **Scalability**: Gitea is known for its lightweight and efficient architecture, making it ideal for small to medium-sized teams and projects. In contrast, Perforce is often preferred for large-scale enterprise applications due to its robust scalability features and support for high traffic volumes.
   
2. **Supported Version Control Protocols**: Gitea primarily supports Git as its version control system, offering features tailored to Git repositories. On the other hand, Perforce utilizes its proprietary version control system known as Helix Core, which provides unique functionality not available in Git.
   
3. **Open Source vs. Proprietary**: Gitea is an open-source platform, meaning users have access to the source code, can modify it, and contribute to the community. Perforce, on the other hand, is a proprietary software with licensing fees and restrictions on source code access and modification.
   
4. **Community Support**: Gitea benefits from a thriving open-source community that actively contributes to its development, provides support, and offers a wide range of plugins and extensions. In comparison, Perforce users rely on official technical support from the company, which can be advantageous for enterprises seeking dedicated assistance.
   
5. **User Interface**: Gitea is known for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for developers of all levels to navigate and utilize its features efficiently. Perforce, while feature-rich, may have a steeper learning curve for new users due to its complex interface and extensive functionalities.
   
6. **Integration Capabilities**: Gitea offers seamless integration with various third-party tools and services such as issue trackers, CI/CD pipelines, and project management software, enhancing its versatility and adaptability within development workflows. Perforce, while supporting integrations, may require additional configurations and customization to achieve the same level of seamless integration as Gitea.

In Summary, Gitea and Perforce differ in terms of scalability, supported version control protocols, open-source vs. proprietary nature, community support, user interface, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Perforce, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Perforce
Perforce
Gitea
Gitea

Visibility, access control, workflow and code management for Git environments. Flexibility of collaborating on the same codebase and code reviews using any combination of Perforce and Git workflows and tools without compromise.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Version Control; Application Lifecycle Management; Static Code Analysis for C, C++, C#, and Java; Codeless Selenium Test Automation; Open Source Support; Enterprise PHP Development
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
83
Stacks
322
Followers
113
Followers
448
Votes
9
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Great for Enterprise level use
  • 3
    Powerful
  • 2
    Robust
  • 1
    Scalable
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
Git
Git
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Perforce, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana