StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Github Actions vs Google Cloud Build

Github Actions vs Google Cloud Build

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Stacks808
Followers207
Votes4
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Github Actions vs Google Cloud Build: What are the differences?

Comparison between Github Actions and Google Cloud Build

In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Github Actions and Google Cloud Build in the format of numbered subheadings and descriptions.

  1. Installation and Setup: Github Actions can be easily installed and set up with the help of a GitHub repository, where you define workflows using YAML files. On the other hand, Google Cloud Build requires the creation of a Cloud Build configuration file and the setup of a Google Cloud project.

  2. Integration and Ecosystem: Github Actions is tightly integrated with the GitHub platform, providing seamless integration with other GitHub features such as pull requests and issue tracking. Google Cloud Build, however, integrates seamlessly with the Google Cloud ecosystem, enabling you to build, test, and deploy applications on Google Cloud Platform.

  3. Pricing and Cost: Github Actions provides limited free minutes for usage and charges for additional minutes, with different pricing plans available. Google Cloud Build pricing is based on the usage and offers a free tier with a specified number of build minutes, and additional minutes are billed accordingly.

  4. Customizability and Extensibility: Github Actions offers a wide range of built-in actions and allows the creation of custom actions to automate various tasks. Google Cloud Build provides a similar way to run custom build steps but has a more limited set of built-in actions compared to Github Actions.

  5. Containerization and Flexibility: Github Actions supports building and running workflows in containers, providing flexibility and compatibility with various programming languages and frameworks. Google Cloud Build is primarily focused on building container images and makes it easy to integrate with other Google Cloud services for a complete deployment pipeline.

  6. Community and Marketplace: Github Actions has a large and active community contributing to the ecosystem, with a marketplace providing a wide range of pre-built workflows and actions. Google Cloud Build has a smaller community compared to Github Actions, with a limited number of pre-built steps and integrations available.

In summary, Github Actions and Google Cloud Build have different installation processes, integration capabilities, pricing models, customizability options, containerization support, and community marketplace size. Choose the platform that aligns best with your project's requirements and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Build, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks
808
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
207
Followers
3.1K
Votes
4
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Container based
  • 2
    GCP easy integration
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor lock-in
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No Deployment Projects
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Build, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana