StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Github Actions vs QuickBuild

Github Actions vs QuickBuild

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

QuickBuild
QuickBuild
Stacks6
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Github Actions vs QuickBuild: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub Actions and QuickBuild

GitHub Actions and QuickBuild are both popular continuous integration and continuous deployment platforms, but they have several key differences.

  1. Integration with GitHub: GitHub Actions is a native feature of GitHub, which means it is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories and utilizes the same authentication and authorization mechanisms. On the other hand, QuickBuild is a standalone CI/CD tool that can be integrated with various version control systems, including GitHub.

  2. Workflow Definition: GitHub Actions uses YAML-based workflow files to define and configure CI/CD workflows. It provides a declarative syntax that allows developers to define the steps, triggers, and conditions for their workflows. In contrast, QuickBuild provides a graphical user interface (GUI) for defining workflows, making it easier for non-technical users to create and modify workflows visually.

  3. Community and Marketplace: GitHub Actions has a vibrant community of developers and a rich ecosystem of pre-built actions and workflows available in the GitHub Marketplace. This allows users to easily discover and reuse existing workflows and actions. QuickBuild also has a plugin system, but its marketplace is not as extensive as GitHub Actions'.

  4. Scalability: GitHub Actions is a cloud-based service provided by GitHub, which means it can automatically scale resources to accommodate increasing workloads. QuickBuild, on the other hand, can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, giving users more control over scalability and resource allocation.

  5. Pricing: GitHub Actions offers a free tier for public repositories and provides pricing plans based on the number of minutes used for workflows in private repositories. QuickBuild is a commercial product and its pricing is based on the number of users and the desired feature set.

  6. Support for Different Environments: GitHub Actions provides built-in support for various programming languages, platforms, and containerization technologies such as Docker. QuickBuild also supports a wide range of environments but may require additional configuration or plugins to work with specific technologies.

In summary, GitHub Actions provides tight integration with GitHub, a YAML-based workflow definition, a large community and marketplace, auto-scaling capabilities, a pricing model based on usage, and built-in support for various technologies. QuickBuild, on the other hand, is a standalone tool with a graphical interface for workflow definition, a smaller marketplace, more flexible deployment options, commercial pricing, and extensive environment support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on QuickBuild, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

QuickBuild
QuickBuild
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

It is a continuous integration and deployment server, featuring hierarchical configuration management, proof build (pre-commit build/test), build promotion pipeline, and flexible build setup

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Single sign-on support; SCM changes aggregation; Gerrit and Artifactory integration; Persist build requests between server restarts.
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks
6
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
14
Followers
3.1K
Votes
0
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    No Versioning
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Small User-base
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 2
    Docker Support
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
Mattermost
Mattermost
Rancher
Rancher
SonarQube
SonarQube
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to QuickBuild, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana