StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Project Management
  5. Github Actions vs Redmine

Github Actions vs Redmine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redmine
Redmine
Stacks590
Followers436
Votes129
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks2.4K
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Github Actions vs Redmine: What are the differences?

Introduction: Markdown code is a lightweight markup language that can be used to format text on websites. In this task, we will format the content about the key differences between GitHub Actions and Redmine as Markdown code. We will provide specific differences in six paragraphs and include subheadings for each difference.

  1. Integration with Git workflows: GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with Git workflows, allowing developers to easily automate their tasks within the repository itself. It provides a seamless integration with pull requests, allowing for automatic feature testing, deployment, and other actions. On the other hand, Redmine does not have this level of integration with Git workflows. It primarily focuses on issue tracking and project management rather than automation within the development process.

  2. Built-in Continuous Integration/Deployment: GitHub Actions provides built-in continuous integration and deployment capabilities. Developers can define workflows to automatically build, test, and deploy their applications. This simplifies the development process by reducing the need for external tools or services. In contrast, Redmine does not offer built-in continuous integration or deployment features. Developers using Redmine would need to rely on external tools or services to achieve similar functionalities.

  3. Community Support and Plugins: GitHub Actions has a large community and offers a wide range of plugins and workflows that are openly shared and maintained by the community. This allows developers to leverage existing workflows and plugins to automate their tasks. Redmine, on the other hand, has a smaller community and a limited number of plugins available. This can result in fewer options and customization capabilities for developers.

  4. User Interface and Project Management Features: Redmine provides a comprehensive web-based user interface for managing projects, tasks, and issues. It offers features such as Gantt charts, time tracking, and role-based access control. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, does not offer project management features directly. It is primarily focused on automation within workflows and does not provide a dedicated user interface for project management.

  5. Pricing and Cost: GitHub Actions offers a certain number of free workflow minutes and additional minutes can be purchased as needed. For open-source projects and small teams, this can be a cost-effective solution. Redmine, on the other hand, is an open-source project management tool that can be self-hosted or deployed on a server, making it cost-effective for organizations that prefer self-hosted solutions. However, there might still be associated costs for hosting and maintenance.

  6. Scalability and Integration with Third-Party Tools: GitHub Actions provides scalable infrastructure and integrates well with other GitHub services. It enables developers to easily include third-party tools and services within their workflows. Redmine, on the other hand, might require additional setup and configurations to integrate with third-party tools or services. It might pose challenges in terms of scalability and managing large-scale projects compared to GitHub Actions.

In summary, GitHub Actions offers tight integration with Git workflows, built-in continuous integration/deployment, strong community support, and scalable infrastructure. It lacks project management features, while Redmine provides a comprehensive web-based user interface for project management but lacks the automation capabilities and community support offered by GitHub Actions. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the development process and the project management requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Redmine, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Redmine
Redmine
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Multiple projects support;Flexible role based access control;Flexible issue tracking system;Gantt chart and calendar;News, documents & files management;Feeds & email notifications;Per project wiki;Per project forums;Time tracking;Custom fields for issues, time-entries, projects and users;SCM integration (SVN, CVS, Git, Mercurial, Bazaar and Darcs);Issue creation via email;Multiple LDAP authentication support;User self-registration support;Multilanguage support;Multiple databases support
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
590
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
436
Followers
3.1K
Votes
129
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 54
    Open source
  • 27
    Customizable with themes and plugins
  • 10
    Integration with code version control like git/svn
  • 9
    Powerful custom queries
  • 6
    Integration with email clients
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 2
    Configs stored in .github
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Redmine, GitHub Actions?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana