Github Actions vs Zoho Projects

Overview

Zoho Projects

Stacks40

Followers45

Votes0

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Github Actions vs Zoho Projects: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control Systems: GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, allowing developers to automate build, test, and deployment workflows directly from the code repository. On the other hand, Zoho Projects does not have the same level of integration with version control systems like GitHub, making it less seamless for developers to manage their project workflows within the code repository.
Target Audience: GitHub Actions is mainly targeted towards developers and DevOps teams who are looking to automate their software development workflows. In contrast, Zoho Projects caters to a broader audience of project managers, team leads, and cross-functional teams involved in project planning and execution, offering a wider range of project management tools beyond CI/CD automation.
Customization and Extensibility: GitHub Actions provides a high level of customization and extensibility through its YAML-based configuration files, allowing users to define complex workflows with multiple steps and conditions. Zoho Projects, while offering customization options, may not provide the same level of flexibility in defining automated workflows compared to GitHub Actions.
Cost Structure: GitHub Actions follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the compute resources used during workflow execution. On the other hand, Zoho Projects typically operates on a subscription-based pricing model, offering different plans with varying levels of features and support. The cost structure of these tools can significantly impact the budgeting and decision-making process for teams adopting them.
Community and Support: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers and contributors who share workflows, plugins, and best practices, making it easier for users to leverage existing resources and knowledge. Zoho Projects also has a community of users and support resources, but the extent of community collaboration and support may differ compared to the GitHub Actions ecosystem.
Scope of Features: GitHub Actions primarily focuses on CI/CD automation and integration capabilities tied to GitHub repositories, offering a specialized set of features for software development workflows. In contrast, Zoho Projects encompasses a broader set of project management features such as Gantt charts, resource allocation, and time tracking, catering to the needs of project managers and teams beyond the software development realm.

In Summary, GitHub Actions excels in seamless integration with version control systems, targeting developers with high customization options and a strong community, while Zoho Projects offers a broader range of project management features and targets a wider audience in project planning and execution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zoho Projects, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zoho Projects	GitHub Actions
It is an online project management software to create and manage projects efficiently. You can plan your project activities, assign work, manage resources and collaborate with your team better to get things done on time.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Task Management; Time Tracking	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 40	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 45	Followers 3.1K
Votes 0	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Zoho Projects, GitHub Actions?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Github Actions vs Zoho Projects: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control Systems: GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, allowing developers to automate build, test, and deployment workflows directly from the code repository. On the other hand, Zoho Projects does not have the same level of integration with version control systems like GitHub, making it less seamless for developers to manage their project workflows within the code repository.
Target Audience: GitHub Actions is mainly targeted towards developers and DevOps teams who are looking to automate their software development workflows. In contrast, Zoho Projects caters to a broader audience of project managers, team leads, and cross-functional teams involved in project planning and execution, offering a wider range of project management tools beyond CI/CD automation.
Customization and Extensibility: GitHub Actions provides a high level of customization and extensibility through its YAML-based configuration files, allowing users to define complex workflows with multiple steps and conditions. Zoho Projects, while offering customization options, may not provide the same level of flexibility in defining automated workflows compared to GitHub Actions.
Cost Structure: GitHub Actions follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the compute resources used during workflow execution. On the other hand, Zoho Projects typically operates on a subscription-based pricing model, offering different plans with varying levels of features and support. The cost structure of these tools can significantly impact the budgeting and decision-making process for teams adopting them.
Community and Support: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers and contributors who share workflows, plugins, and best practices, making it easier for users to leverage existing resources and knowledge. Zoho Projects also has a community of users and support resources, but the extent of community collaboration and support may differ compared to the GitHub Actions ecosystem.
Scope of Features: GitHub Actions primarily focuses on CI/CD automation and integration capabilities tied to GitHub repositories, offering a specialized set of features for software development workflows. In contrast, Zoho Projects encompasses a broader set of project management features such as Gantt charts, resource allocation, and time tracking, catering to the needs of project managers and teams beyond the software development realm.

Github Actions vs Zoho Projects

Overview