GitHub vs GitKraken

Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.6K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

GitHub vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitHub and GitKraken are both popular tools used in software development for version control and collaboration. While both tools serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences that set them apart.

User Interface: GitHub provides a web-based user interface that allows users to interact with their repositories, create issues, and review pull requests directly on the website. On the other hand, GitKraken offers a desktop application with an intuitive visual interface that makes it easier to perform Git operations, visualize commit history, and manage branches.
Integration with Git: GitHub is built on top of Git and provides hosting for Git repositories. It offers additional features like pull requests, issue tracking, and collaboration tools specifically designed for teams. GitKraken also utilizes Git for version control but focuses more on providing an enhanced user interface and user experience, making it a popular choice among individual developers.
Collaboration Tools: GitHub offers a wide range of collaboration tools, such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, which make it easier for teams to work together on a project. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not have built-in collaboration tools and is more geared towards individual developers or small teams who prioritize a streamlined developer experience.
Support for Git Workflow: GitHub provides support for various Git workflows, such as the Forking Workflow, Branching Workflow, and Feature Branch Workflow. These workflows enable teams to collaborate efficiently and follow industry best practices. GitKraken offers a simpler approach to Git workflows and focuses more on simplifying the Git experience rather than providing in-depth support for specific workflows.
Platforms Supported: GitHub is a web-based platform and can be accessed via a web browser on any operating system. GitKraken, on the other hand, provides a desktop application that is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows GitKraken to provide a more consistent user experience across different platforms.
Pricing: GitHub offers both free and paid subscription plans. The free plan provides basic features, while the paid plans offer additional perks like private repositories, advanced collaboration tools, and more storage. GitKraken also provides both free and paid plans, but its focus is more on the user interface and ease of use rather than the collaboration tools offered by GitHub.

In summary, GitHub and GitKraken differ in terms of user interface, integration with Git, collaboration tools, support for Git workflows, platforms supported, and pricing. While GitHub is more geared towards team collaboration and provides extensive collaboration features, GitKraken focuses on providing an intuitive visual interface for individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitHub, GitKraken

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	GitKraken
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	-
Statistics
Stacks 295.6K	Stacks 725
Followers 259.0K	Followers 909
Votes 10.4K	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Full featured client 21 Gitflow support Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 3 Does not work like a Mac app 3 Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	Git

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitKraken?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction:

User Interface: GitHub provides a web-based user interface that allows users to interact with their repositories, create issues, and review pull requests directly on the website. On the other hand, GitKraken offers a desktop application with an intuitive visual interface that makes it easier to perform Git operations, visualize commit history, and manage branches.
Integration with Git: GitHub is built on top of Git and provides hosting for Git repositories. It offers additional features like pull requests, issue tracking, and collaboration tools specifically designed for teams. GitKraken also utilizes Git for version control but focuses more on providing an enhanced user interface and user experience, making it a popular choice among individual developers.
Collaboration Tools: GitHub offers a wide range of collaboration tools, such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, which make it easier for teams to work together on a project. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not have built-in collaboration tools and is more geared towards individual developers or small teams who prioritize a streamlined developer experience.
Support for Git Workflow: GitHub provides support for various Git workflows, such as the Forking Workflow, Branching Workflow, and Feature Branch Workflow. These workflows enable teams to collaborate efficiently and follow industry best practices. GitKraken offers a simpler approach to Git workflows and focuses more on simplifying the Git experience rather than providing in-depth support for specific workflows.
Platforms Supported: GitHub is a web-based platform and can be accessed via a web browser on any operating system. GitKraken, on the other hand, provides a desktop application that is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows GitKraken to provide a more consistent user experience across different platforms.
Pricing: GitHub offers both free and paid subscription plans. The free plan provides basic features, while the paid plans offer additional perks like private repositories, advanced collaboration tools, and more storage. GitKraken also provides both free and paid plans, but its focus is more on the user interface and ease of use rather than the collaboration tools offered by GitHub.

GitHub vs GitKraken

Overview