StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs GitKraken vs SourceTree

GitHub vs GitKraken vs SourceTree

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks296.4K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
SourceTree
SourceTree
Stacks10.6K
Followers8.1K
Votes727
GitKraken
GitKraken
Stacks726
Followers910
Votes290

GitHub vs GitKraken vs SourceTree: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with GitHub: GitKraken and SourceTree both offer integration with GitHub, allowing users to easily manage their repositories, view pull requests, and collaborate with others directly within the platform.
  2. Interface Design: GitKraken is known for its sleek and user-friendly interface, making it easy for new users to navigate and understand the version control process. SourceTree, on the other hand, offers a more traditional layout that may appeal to users who prefer a more familiar setup.
  3. Supported Platforms: GitKraken is available on Windows, Mac, and Linux, providing cross-platform support for users on different operating systems. SourceTree offers support for Windows and Mac only, limiting its accessibility for Linux users.
  4. Built-in Git Commands: SourceTree provides more comprehensive support for Git commands directly within the interface, allowing users to perform a wide range of version control operations without needing to rely on the command line. GitKraken, while still offering Git command support, may require users to have a basic understanding of Git commands for certain operations.
  5. Cost: GitKraken offers a free version with limited features and a premium paid version with additional functionalities. SourceTree, on the other hand, is completely free to use, making it a cost-effective option for users looking for a version control solution without any additional expenses.
  6. Community Support and Updates: GitKraken has a strong community and regular updates that add new features and enhance the overall user experience. SourceTree also receives updates but may not have the same level of community support as GitKraken, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues and fewer user-generated resources.

In Summary, the key differences between GitHub, GitKraken, and SourceTree lie in their integration with GitHub, interface design, supported platforms, built-in Git commands, cost, and community support/updates.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, SourceTree, GitKraken

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

625k views625k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
SourceTree
SourceTree
GitKraken
GitKraken

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Full-powered DVCS;Create, clone, commit, push, pull, merge, and more are all just a click away.;Review your outgoing and incoming changesets, cherry-pick between branches, patch handling, rebase, stash, shelve, and much more.;Use Git-flow and Hg-flow with ease. Keep your repositories cleaner and your development more efficient with SourceTree's intuitive interface to Git and Hg's 'branchy' development model.
-
Statistics
Stacks
296.4K
Stacks
10.6K
Stacks
726
Followers
259.0K
Followers
8.1K
Followers
910
Votes
10.4K
Votes
727
Votes
290
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1776
    Open source friendly
  • 1464
    Easy source control
  • 1256
    Nice UI
  • 1138
    Great for team collaboration
  • 869
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 59
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 39
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 16
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 205
    Visual history and branch view
  • 164
    Beautiful UI
  • 134
    Easy repository browsing
  • 87
    Gitflow support
  • 75
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
Cons
  • 12
    Crashes often
  • 8
    So many bugs
  • 7
    Fetching is slow sometimes
  • 5
    No dark theme (Windows)
  • 5
    Extremely slow
Pros
  • 60
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Full featured client
  • 21
    Gitflow support
Cons
  • 4
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 4
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 4
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 3
    Not as many features as sourcetree
  • 3
    Does not work like a Mac app
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Git
Git
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Mercurial
Mercurial
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to GitHub, SourceTree, GitKraken?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Sublime Merge

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana