GitLab vs Gogs

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Gogs are both popular web-based Git repository management systems that provide essential features for version control. While they share similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

Installation and Deployment: GitLab requires substantial hardware resources and is typically installed on a dedicated server. It necessitates the installation of additional dependencies and configuration steps to set up fully. On the other hand, Gogs is lightweight and can be easily installed on any machine. It has a simple installation process that doesn't require many resources or dependencies.
User Interface: GitLab offers a feature-rich and customizable user interface with a wide range of functionality. It has an intuitive design and provides detailed insights and analytics. Gogs, on the other hand, has a minimalist user interface that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and lightweight interface without compromising essential Git features.
Built-in CI/CD: GitLab comes with built-in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. This allows developers to automate the testing, building, and deployment processes seamlessly. Gogs, on the other hand, does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities. Developers using Gogs would need to integrate additional external tools for CI/CD functionality.
Enterprise Features: GitLab offers a range of enterprise-grade features such as advanced user management, LDAP integration, and more. It provides extensive capabilities for large-scale organizations and supports multi-level permissions and access controls. Gogs, on the other hand, lacks some of these enterprise features and is more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.
Community Support and Development: GitLab has a more extensive and active community of developers, contributors, and users. It has a larger ecosystem of plugins, integrations, and third-party tools. This ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and feature enhancements. Gogs, although growing, has a smaller community and may have fewer available extensions and integrations.
Documentation and Resources: GitLab offers comprehensive documentation and a wealth of educational resources. It provides detailed guides, tutorials, and an active forum for user support and interaction. Gogs, while having documentation and community forums, may not have the same level of depth or breadth as GitLab.

In summary, GitLab is a feature-rich and robust solution that is suitable for enterprise-level organizations. It offers advanced features, built-in CI/CD, and has a large and active community of users. Gogs, on the other hand, is a lightweight and easy-to-install option that focuses on simplicity and is more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Gogs

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Gogs
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 175
Followers 54.5K	Followers 306
Votes 2.5K	Votes 182
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Gogs?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Installation and Deployment: GitLab requires substantial hardware resources and is typically installed on a dedicated server. It necessitates the installation of additional dependencies and configuration steps to set up fully. On the other hand, Gogs is lightweight and can be easily installed on any machine. It has a simple installation process that doesn't require many resources or dependencies.
User Interface: GitLab offers a feature-rich and customizable user interface with a wide range of functionality. It has an intuitive design and provides detailed insights and analytics. Gogs, on the other hand, has a minimalist user interface that focuses on simplicity and ease of use. It provides a clean and lightweight interface without compromising essential Git features.
Built-in CI/CD: GitLab comes with built-in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. This allows developers to automate the testing, building, and deployment processes seamlessly. Gogs, on the other hand, does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities. Developers using Gogs would need to integrate additional external tools for CI/CD functionality.
Enterprise Features: GitLab offers a range of enterprise-grade features such as advanced user management, LDAP integration, and more. It provides extensive capabilities for large-scale organizations and supports multi-level permissions and access controls. Gogs, on the other hand, lacks some of these enterprise features and is more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.
Community Support and Development: GitLab has a more extensive and active community of developers, contributors, and users. It has a larger ecosystem of plugins, integrations, and third-party tools. This ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and feature enhancements. Gogs, although growing, has a smaller community and may have fewer available extensions and integrations.
Documentation and Resources: GitLab offers comprehensive documentation and a wealth of educational resources. It provides detailed guides, tutorials, and an active forum for user support and interaction. Gogs, while having documentation and community forums, may not have the same level of depth or breadth as GitLab.

GitLab vs Gogs

Overview