Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitLab vs JetBrains Space: What are the differences?
Introduction In this comparison, we will be discussing the key differences between GitLab and JetBrains Space. Both GitLab and JetBrains Space are software development platforms that provide a variety of tools and features to help developers and teams collaborate on projects. However, there are several distinct differences between the two platforms that are worth noting.
Hosting Options: GitLab offers both a cloud-hosted SaaS solution as well as a self-hosted option, giving users the flexibility to choose the hosting method that best fits their needs. On the other hand, JetBrains Space is only available as a cloud-hosted service, meaning users do not have the option to self-host their instances.
Integrated Development Environment (IDE): JetBrains Space provides a fully-integrated development environment, which means developers can write, build, and deploy code directly within the platform. GitLab, on the other hand, does not offer an integrated IDE and focuses more on providing version control and project management features.
Collaboration Tools: While both platforms offer tools for collaboration, JetBrains Space places a strong emphasis on fostering teamwork and communication. It provides features such as team chats, video conferencing, and knowledge sharing to facilitate collaboration within development teams. GitLab, while offering some collaboration features like code reviews and issue tracking, does not have the same level of emphasis on team communication.
Issue Tracking Tools: GitLab has more robust issue tracking capabilities compared to JetBrains Space. GitLab provides a variety of features for managing and tracking issues, including customizable issue boards, milestones, and labels. JetBrains Space, while having basic issue tracking functionality, does not offer the same level of customization and features as GitLab in this area.
Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Both GitLab and JetBrains Space offer CI/CD functionality to automate the build, test, and deployment processes. However, GitLab has a more mature and comprehensive CI/CD pipeline system, with robust features for configuring and managing complex pipelines. JetBrains Space has a simpler CI/CD setup, which may be more suitable for projects with less complex deployment requirements.
Pricing Model: GitLab offers a range of pricing options, including free plans, as well as different tiers with varying features and support levels for enterprise users. JetBrains Space, on the other hand, has a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly fee per user. This can be advantageous for smaller teams or organizations with a predictable number of users, but may not be as flexible for larger teams that need more scalability options.
In summary, GitLab offers more hosting options, focuses on version control and project management, and has more robust issue tracking and CI/CD capabilities. JetBrains Space, on the other hand, provides a fully-integrated IDE, highlights collaboration and teamwork, and has a simpler pricing model. Choosing between the two platforms ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.
Pros of GitLab
- Self hosted508
- Free431
- Has community edition339
- Easy setup242
- Familiar interface240
- Includes many features, including ci137
- Nice UI113
- Good integration with gitlabci84
- Simple setup57
- Has an official mobile app35
- Free private repository34
- Continuous Integration31
- Open source, great ui (like github)23
- Slack Integration18
- Full CI flow15
- Free and unlimited private git repos11
- All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)10
- User, group, and project access management is simple10
- Intuitive UI8
- Built-in CI8
- Full DevOps suite with Git6
- Both public and private Repositories6
- Integrated Docker Registry5
- So easy to use5
- CI5
- Build/pipeline definition alongside code5
- It's powerful source code management tool5
- Dockerized4
- It's fully integrated4
- On-premises4
- Security and Stable4
- Unlimited free repos & collaborators4
- Not Microsoft Owned4
- Excellent4
- Issue system4
- Mattermost Chat client4
- Great for team collaboration3
- Free private repos3
- Because is the best remote host for git repositories3
- Built-in Docker Registry3
- Opensource3
- Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment3
- I like the its runners and executors feature3
- Beautiful2
- Groups of groups2
- Multilingual interface2
- Powerful software planning and maintaining tools2
- Review Apps feature2
- Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI2
- One-click install through DigitalOcean2
- Powerful Continuous Integration System2
- It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker2
- The dashboard with deployed environments2
- HipChat intergration2
- Many private repo2
- Kubernetes Integration2
- Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)2
- Wounderful2
- Native CI2
- Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits1
Pros of JetBrains Space
- Seamless integration in JetBrains IDEs3
- CI&CD in Kotlin DSL1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitLab
- Slow ui performance28
- Introduce breaking bugs every release9
- Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)6
- Built-in Docker Registry2
- Review Apps feature1
Cons of JetBrains Space
- Expensive1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is GitLab?
What is JetBrains Space?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use GitLab?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with GitLab?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7