StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Review Board

GitLab vs Review Board

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Review Board
Review Board
Stacks19
Followers52
Votes6
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks435

GitLab vs Review Board: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Review Board are both popular code collaboration platforms used by software development teams. While they share similarities in providing tools for code review and version control management, there are key differences between the two. This Markdown code provides a concise comparison highlighting the six main differences between GitLab and Review Board.

  1. Integration with Version Control System: GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that offers a built-in Git repository and supports other version control systems like SVN. In contrast, Review Board is primarily focused on code review and integrates with various version control systems such as Git, Mercurial, and Perforce. GitLab's extensive support for version control gives it an advantage when it comes to managing different types of projects.

  2. User Interface and User Experience: GitLab has a more modern and intuitive user interface that makes it easier for developers to navigate and access various features. On the other hand, Review Board has a simpler interface that focuses primarily on code review functionality. GitLab's visually appealing and user-friendly interface enhances productivity and usability for development teams.

  3. Built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): GitLab offers a built-in CI/CD pipeline to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying applications. This comprehensive CI/CD functionality streamlines the development workflow, making it more efficient and convenient for teams. Review Board, however, does not offer built-in CI/CD capabilities, requiring separate tools or manual processes to achieve the same level of automation.

  4. Code Collaboration Features: GitLab provides a wide range of collaborative features like merge requests, issue tracking, and inline code commenting that facilitate team collaboration and communication. Review Board, being a dedicated code review tool, offers robust code review capabilities with features like diff visualization, commenting, and reviewing changesets. While GitLab's collaboration features are more comprehensive, Review Board's specialized focus on code review provides more in-depth reviewing capabilities.

  5. Community and Marketplace: GitLab has a larger and more active community, providing access to a wealth of resources, support, and community-contributed extensions and integrations. It also has an extensive marketplace with a wide range of plugins and tools that can be easily integrated into the platform. Review Board, although it has an active community, does not have the same level of marketplace and integration options as GitLab.

  6. Pricing and Deployment Options: GitLab offers both a self-hosted Community Edition and a cloud-hosted version with different pricing tiers, including a free tier for small teams. It provides flexibility in deployment options, allowing teams to choose the one that fits their needs and budgets. Review Board, on the other hand, is primarily self-hosted and is available for free as an open-source product. The self-hosted nature of Review Board may require additional infrastructure and maintenance costs.

In Summary, GitLab is an all-in-one DevOps platform with extensive version control system integration and built-in CI/CD capabilities, offering an intuitive user experience and a wide range of collaboration features. Review Board, on the other hand, is a dedicated code review tool with a simpler interface, powerful code review capabilities, and a focus on compatibility with various version control systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Review Board

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Review Board
Review Board

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
435
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
19
Followers
54.5K
Followers
52
Votes
2.5K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 3
    Simple to use. Great UI
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Review Bots
  • 1
    Diff between review versions
Integrations
No integrations available
Travis CI
Travis CI
Slack
Slack
iDoneThis
iDoneThis
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Git
Git
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
CircleCI
CircleCI
Trello
Trello
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Review Board?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana