StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Helm Charts
  5. Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helm

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Helm
Helm
Stacks1.4K
Followers911
Votes18
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Stacks177
Followers198
Votes0

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Helm: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google Cloud Container Builder and Helm are both popular tools used in the containerization of applications. While they may seem similar at first glance, there are key differences that set them apart. This article highlights six significant variations between Google Cloud Container Builder and Helm.

  1. Functionality: Google Cloud Container Builder is primarily designed as a fully managed, serverless build service that leverages built-in tooling to build, test, and deploy containerized applications. On the other hand, Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes that simplifies the deployment and management of applications through reusable charts.

  2. Scope: While Google Cloud Container Builder focuses on providing a streamlined build process for container images, Helm goes beyond just building and encompasses a wider scope of capabilities such as packaging, templating, and managing the lifecycle of Kubernetes applications.

  3. Dependency Management: Google Cloud Container Builder does not have built-in functionality for managing dependencies within containers. In contrast, Helm offers dependency management that allows users to define and manage dependencies within their charts, simplifying the process of deploying and managing complex applications with multiple components.

  4. Versioning and Rollbacks: Helm provides versioning and rollback capabilities, enabling users to easily track and manage changes to their applications over time. Google Cloud Container Builder, being primarily a build service, does not offer built-in versioning or rollback functionality.

  5. Templates: Helm utilizes templates, allowing users to define reusable configurations for deploying applications. These templates can be parameterized, making it convenient to deploy multiple instances of the same application with varying configurations. In contrast, Google Cloud Container Builder does not have built-in template functionality.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Helm has a vibrant and active community, with a wide range of pre-existing charts available for various applications. This extensive ecosystem of charts enables users to quickly deploy and manage popular applications without starting from scratch. Google Cloud Container Builder, being a managed service, does not have a dedicated community or pre-existing charts ecosystem associated with it.

In summary, Google Cloud Container Builder is a serverless build service focused on building container images, while Helm is a package manager for Kubernetes with a broader scope, including packaging, templating, and managing the lifecycle of applications. Helm also offers features such as dependency management, versioning, rollback, templates, and a vibrant community ecosystem of pre-existing charts.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Helm
Helm
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder

Helm is the best way to find, share, and use software built for Kubernetes.

Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.

Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
177
Followers
911
Followers
198
Votes
18
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Infrastructure as code
  • 6
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
  • 1
    Support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Helm, Google Cloud Container Builder?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot