Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL vs graphql.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
GraphQL is a query language and runtime that enables clients to request and receive the data they need from servers in a flexible and efficient manner. On the other hand, graphql.js is a JavaScript library that provides a set of tools and utilities for building GraphQL schemas, resolvers, and servers. While both GraphQL and graphql.js are related to GraphQL technology, there are several key differences between them.
Syntax and Usage: GraphQL is a language that has its own syntax and set of rules for defining and querying APIs. It allows clients to specify the data they need and receive that data in a structured format. On the other hand, graphql.js is a JavaScript library that is used to implement GraphQL functionality in server applications. It provides tools for defining schemas, resolvers, and executing queries.
Server-Side Only: GraphQL is a language and specification that can be used in both client and server applications. It allows clients to query data from servers, but it can also be used to define and implement APIs on the server side. In contrast, graphql.js is specifically designed for server-side usage. It provides the necessary tools and utilities for building GraphQL servers in JavaScript.
Functionality: GraphQL provides a complete set of features for querying and manipulating data. It supports features like query variables, mutations, subscriptions, and directives. It also has built-in support for introspection, allowing clients to discover the capabilities of a GraphQL API. On the other hand, graphql.js is primarily focused on providing the tools and utilities for implementing GraphQL servers. It does not have built-in support for all the features of GraphQL and may require additional libraries for certain functionality.
Flexibility: GraphQL is designed to be a flexible and adaptable technology. It allows clients to specify the data they need in a declarative and precise manner. Clients can query for specific fields, specify arguments, and define complex nested structures. GraphQL also supports type introspection, enabling clients to dynamically discover the schema of a GraphQL API. GraphQL.js, while providing tools for building GraphQL servers, may not offer the same level of flexibility out of the box. Developers may need to write custom code to handle specific use cases or extend the functionality of graphql.js.
Community and Ecosystem: GraphQL has a large and active community of developers and has gained significant popularity in recent years. It has a wide range of tooling, libraries, and frameworks built around it, making it easier to integrate and use GraphQL in various contexts. On the other hand, graphql.js, being a JavaScript library, also benefits from the vibrant JavaScript ecosystem. It can leverage existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks to build GraphQL servers and integrate with other technologies.
Maturity and Adoption: GraphQL has been adopted by numerous companies and organizations for building APIs and client-server communication. It has proven to be a reliable and scalable technology, used by companies like Facebook, GitHub, and many others. GraphQL.js, being a library for implementing GraphQL servers, also benefits from the maturity and adoption of GraphQL itself. It is actively maintained and updated to align with the latest advancements and best practices in the GraphQL ecosystem.
In summary, GraphQL is a query language and specification that enables clients to request and receive the data they need from servers, while graphql.js is a JavaScript library that provides tools and utilities for building GraphQL servers. GraphQL is more focused on the language and specification aspects, providing a complete set of features and flexibility, while graphql.js is specific to server-side usage and may require additional customization for specific use cases. Both of them benefit from the strong community and adoption of GraphQL technology.
Pros of GraphQL
- Schemas defined by the requests made by the user75
- Will replace RESTful interfaces63
- The future of API's62
- The future of databases49
- Get many resources in a single request12
- Self-documenting12
- Ask for what you need, get exactly that6
- Query Language6
- Fetch different resources in one request3
- Type system3
- Evolve your API without versions3
- Ease of client creation2
- GraphiQL2
- Easy setup2
- "Open" document1
- Fast prototyping1
- Supports subscription1
- Standard1
- Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)1
- 1. Describe your data1
- Better versioning1
- Backed by Facebook1
- Easy to learn1
Pros of graphql.js
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL
- Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology4
- More code to type.4
- Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.2
- No support for caching1
- All the pros sound like NFT pitches1
- No support for streaming1
- Works just like any other API at runtime1
- N+1 fetch problem1
- No built in security1