Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL Zeus vs Paw: What are the differences?
Developers describe GraphQL Zeus as "Autocomplete client library with strong GraphQL typed queries *". It is a simple tool working in Node.js & browser to generate an auto-complete client library for Javascript or Typescript. It creates its own specification along with type-safe completion of request & responses. On the other hand, *Paw** is detailed as "The ultimate REST client for Mac". Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.
GraphQL Zeus and Paw can be categorized as "API" tools.
GraphQL Zeus is an open source tool with 406 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks. Here's a link to GraphQL Zeus's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of GraphQL Zeus
Pros of Paw
- Great interface46
- Easy to use37
- More stable and performant than the others25
- Saves endpoints list for testing16
- Supports environment variables13
- Integrations12
- Multi-Dimension Environment Settings9
- Paste curl commands into Paw4
- Creates code for any language or framework2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL Zeus
Cons of Paw
- It's not free3
- MacOS Only2
