StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Grav vs Kentico

Grav vs Kentico

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grav
Grav
Stacks114
Followers158
Votes16
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks1.4K
Kentico
Kentico
Stacks27
Followers35
Votes0

Grav vs Kentico: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Grav and Kentico, it's essential to understand the key differences between the two content management systems to make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.

  1. Architecture: Grav is a flat-file CMS, meaning it does not rely on a database to store content but instead uses files and folders. On the other hand, Kentico is a traditional database-driven CMS, storing content in a structured database format. This difference in architecture affects performance, scalability, and ease of maintenance.

  2. Flexibility: Grav offers more flexibility and freedom in terms of site structure and design customization. With its modular architecture, developers can create custom themes and plugins easily. Kentico, being a more traditional CMS, has predefined templates and modules, limiting customization options compared to Grav.

  3. Cost: Grav is an open-source CMS, meaning it's free to use and modify, making it a cost-effective solution for individuals and small businesses. Kentico, on the other hand, is a commercial CMS with licensing fees based on the edition and features required. This cost difference can impact the overall budget for implementing and maintaining a website.

  4. Learning Curve: Grav is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it an excellent choice for beginners and non-technical users. Kentico, with its advanced features and complex structure, has a steeper learning curve, requiring more experience and expertise to fully utilize its capabilities.

  5. Community Support: Grav has a vibrant community of developers and users who contribute to its growth by creating themes, plugins, and providing support through forums and documentation. Kentico, being a commercial CMS, offers dedicated support from the company but may lack the extensive community-driven resources available for Grav.

  6. Scalability: Grav is suitable for small to medium-sized websites due to its flat-file architecture, which may not scale well for larger, content-heavy websites. Kentico, with its database-driven structure and enterprise-level features, is better equipped to handle large-scale websites with complex content management needs.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Grav and Kentico in terms of architecture, flexibility, cost, learning curve, community support, and scalability is crucial for choosing the most suitable CMS for your specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grav
Grav
Kentico
Kentico

It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors.

It is a web content management system for building websites, online stores, intranets, and Web 2.0 community sites. It uses ASP.NET and Microsoft SQL Server for development via its Portal Engine, using Visual Studio, or through Microsoft MVC. Kentico is also compatible with Microsoft Azure.

Twig; YAML; Markdown; Flat-file; CLI
MVC Page Builder; WYSIWYG Editor; Multilingual Contentl; MVC Form Builder
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
114
Stacks
27
Followers
158
Followers
35
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to Update
  • 3
    No Databases
  • 2
    Extensive Plugins
  • 2
    Fast Performance
  • 2
    Full Control over customisation + functionality
Cons
  • 2
    Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)
Cons
  • 1
    Expensive
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Symfony
Symfony
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Grav, Kentico?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack