Grav vs Pagekit: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Grav and Pagekit are both content management systems that offer unique features and functionalities. Below are key differences between Grav and Pagekit.

1. **Architecture**: Grav is a flat-file CMS which means it does not require a database to store content, making it faster and more lightweight. Pagekit, on the other hand, uses a traditional database-driven architecture for content storage and management.
2. **Customization**: Grav allows for extensive customization using themes and plugins, providing flexibility and control over the design and functionality of the website. Pagekit also offers customization options but may be limited compared to Grav in terms of available themes and plugins.
3. **Learning Curve**: Grav is known for its ease of use and minimalistic approach, making it ideal for beginners or users who prefer a simpler interface. Pagekit, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more complex features and functionalities.
4. **Community Support**: Grav has a strong community of developers and users who actively contribute to the development of themes, plugins, and documentation, providing ample support and resources for users. Pagekit, while also having a community, may not have as extensive support and resources available as Grav.
5. **Target Audience**: Grav is often preferred by developers and users who value performance, flexibility, and simplicity in a CMS. Pagekit, on the other hand, may be more suitable for users who prioritize a more visual and interactive interface with a focus on user experience.
6. **Scalability**: Grav is highly scalable and can handle large amounts of content efficiently, making it suitable for websites of all sizes. Pagekit, while also scalable, may have limitations in handling extremely large websites with high traffic volumes.

In Summary, Grav and Pagekit differ in their architecture, customization options, learning curve, community support, target audience, and scalability. Each CMS has its strengths and weaknesses, catering to different user preferences and needs.