Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gridsome vs Hugo: What are the differences?
1. Templating Language: One key difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the templating language used. Gridsome uses Vue.js as its templating language, which provides a more dynamic and reactive approach to building websites. On the other hand, Hugo uses its own templating language called Hugo Templates, which is simple and fast.
2. Build Speed: Another significant difference is the build speed of the websites. Gridsome uses GraphQL to fetch and manage data, which allows for highly efficient data fetching and faster build times. On the contrary, Hugo is known for its incredible build speed, being one of the fastest static site generators available.
3. Plugin Ecosystem: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their plugin ecosystems. Gridsome has a growing and active plugin ecosystem with various plugins available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, Hugo has a vast number of highly optimized and well-documented community-created themes and templates.
4. Content Sources: Gridsome and Hugo differ in the types of content sources they can integrate with. Gridsome excels in pulling data from multiple sources like Markdown files, headless CMSs, APIs, and databases using GraphQL. In contrast, Hugo primarily focuses on static content sources such as Markdown files and JSON/YAML data.
5. Asset Pipeline: Another difference between Gridsome and Hugo is the way they handle assets like images and stylesheets. Gridsome leverages the power of webpack and allows developers to import and optimize assets effortlessly. In contrast, Hugo follows a simpler approach where developers need to manually handle the assets and place them in the appropriate directories.
6. Community Support: Gridsome and Hugo also differ in terms of their community support. Gridsome has a growing community with active developers and regular updates, but it is relatively newer compared to Hugo. Hugo, on the other hand, has an extensive and mature community with a vast amount of documentation, forums, and resources available.
In Summary, Gridsome and Hugo differ in their templating language, build speed, plugin ecosystem, content sources, asset pipeline, and community support.
As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML
or Markdown
(what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.
Pros of Gridsome
- Vuejs16
- GraphQL10
- Starter kit as a base for new project6
- Reusable components (Vue)5
- Open source4
- Allows to use markdown files as articles3
- Static-sites3
- Generated websites are super fast2
- Blogging website2
- Webpack0
Pros of Hugo
- Lightning fast47
- Single Executable29
- Easy setup26
- Great development community24
- Open source23
- Write in golang13
- Not HTML only - JSON, RSS8
- Hacker mindset8
- LiveReload built in7
- Gitlab pages integration4
- Easy to customize themes4
- Very fast builds4
- Well documented3
- Fast builds3
- Easy to learn3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gridsome
- Open source1
- Still young1
Cons of Hugo
- No Plugins/Extensions4
- Template syntax not friendly2
- Quick builds1