StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search As A Service
  5. Groonga vs Manticore Search

Groonga vs Manticore Search

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Groonga
Groonga
Stacks2
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars831
Forks120
Manticore Search
Manticore Search
Stacks10
Followers21
Votes22
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks619

Groonga vs Manticore Search: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Groonga and Manticore Search

1. Full-text Search Capabilities: Groonga is a highly performant and feature-rich full-text search engine that supports various search functionalities, including natural language search, tokenization, and stemming. On the other hand, Manticore Search is also a powerful full-text search engine that excels in real-time indexing and search speed, with additional capabilities such as phrase searching and relevance ranking algorithms.

2. Indexing and Storage Architecture: Groonga adopts a column-oriented storage structure that enables efficient querying of structured data while also supporting full-text search. It provides a highly extensible relational model, making it suitable for complex data structures. In contrast, Manticore Search utilizes an inverted indexing approach combined with the disk-based storage model, focusing on efficient full-text search on unstructured data.

3. Scalability and Distributed Search: Groonga is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to distribute their data across multiple server nodes for improved performance and fault tolerance. It offers built-in replication and sharding capabilities, making it well-suited for large-scale deployments. Manticore Search also supports distributed search and can be seamlessly integrated into distributed environments, leveraging its distributed index and real-time clustering features.

4. Language Support and Compatibility: Groonga provides interfaces, plugins, and libraries for multiple programming languages, including Ruby, Python, and C++. It also offers compatibility with various data formats and APIs, enabling easy integration with existing applications. Manticore Search, on the other hand, primarily focuses on compatibility with Sphinx, ensuring a smooth transition for users already familiar with Sphinx's APIs and configurations.

5. Query Language and Querying Capabilities: Groonga offers a flexible query language called Groonga Query Language (GQL), allowing users to construct complex queries using logical operators, functions, and filters. It supports various search types, ranging from simple keyword searches to advanced queries involving ranking and scoring. Manticore Search uses its own query language called SphinxQL, which provides a wealth of querying options like attribute filtering, group-by queries, and distributed searching while maintaining Sphinx's performance advantages.

6. Community and Ecosystem: Groonga has an active open-source community with regular releases, extensive documentation, and a wide range of plugins and tools developed by the community. It also provides commercial support options for enterprise users. On the other hand, Manticore Search boasts a growing community and an active development team, continuously incorporating user feedback and releasing updates. It offers extensive documentation, available plugins, and a vibrant ecosystem that includes official support and professional services.

In Summary, Groonga and Manticore Search differ in terms of full-text search capabilities, indexing and storage architecture, scalability, language support, query language, and the strength of their respective communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Groonga
Groonga
Manticore Search
Manticore Search

It is an embeddable super fast full text search engine. It can be embedded into MySQL. Mroonga is a storage engine that is based on it.

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Storage Engine; Fast; Easy to use
Full-text searching; RealTIme indexing; Facets; Percolate Queries; Distributed indexes; JSON attributes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
831
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Forks
120
GitHub Forks
619
Stacks
2
Stacks
10
Followers
15
Followers
21
Votes
0
Votes
22
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    JSON over HTTP
  • 2
    Real-time inserts
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Distributed
  • 2
    Lightweight
Integrations
Snowplow
Snowplow
Kibana
Kibana
Couchbase
Couchbase
Cloud 66
Cloud 66
Datadog
Datadog
Redash
Redash
Logstash
Logstash
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Groonga, Manticore Search?

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Azure Search

Azure Search

Azure Search makes it easy to add powerful and sophisticated search capabilities to your website or application. Quickly and easily tune search results and construct rich, fine-tuned ranking models to tie search results to business goals. Reliable throughput and storage provide fast search indexing and querying to support time-sensitive search scenarios.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Swiftype

Swiftype

Swiftype is the easiest way to add great search to your website or mobile application.

MeiliSearch

MeiliSearch

It is a powerful, fast, open-source, easy to use, and deploy search engine. The search and indexation are fully customizable and handles features like typo-tolerance, filters, and synonyms.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope