Overview

gulp

Stacks14.3K

Followers9.1K

Votes1.7K

GitHub Stars33.0K

Forks4.2K

Yarn

Stacks24.8K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

Yarn vs gulp: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, Yarn and Gulp are two popular tools that are used to automate various tasks. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of their functionality and purpose.

Dependency Management: Yarn is a package manager that focuses on efficient and reliable dependency management. It uses a lockfile to ensure consistent installs and enables parallel package installations. On the other hand, Gulp is a task runner that helps automate repetitive development tasks such as file concatenation, minification, and code compilation.
Workflow: Yarn primarily focuses on streamlining the development workflow by managing package dependencies and ensuring their consistent installation. It provides a command-line interface and integrates with various development environments. On the other hand, Gulp focuses on task automation, allowing developers to define and run tasks in a specific order to streamline their development process.
Configuration: Yarn fetches and installs packages based on a manifest file (package.json), which contains all the dependency information for a project. It provides a consistent and reproducible environment for developers. Gulp, on the other hand, uses a configuration file (gulpfile.js) to define the tasks and their dependencies. This file can be customized to include additional plugins and modules as per the project requirements.
Task Execution: Yarn focuses on managing and resolving dependencies, but it does not have built-in support for running tasks and automating tasks. Gulp, on the other hand, is specifically designed for task automation. It allows developers to define tasks using plugins and modules and execute them in a specific order.
Code Optimizations: Yarn does not directly provide tools for code optimization and workflow automation. It primarily focuses on dependency management. Gulp, on the other hand, provides a wide range of plugins and modules that can be used to perform code optimizations, such as minification, concatenation, and transpilation.
Integration with Ecosystem: Yarn integrates well with the wider JavaScript ecosystem and can be easily used with other tools and frameworks such as npm and webpack. Gulp, on the other hand, has its own ecosystem of plugins and can be used in conjunction with other build tools to streamline the development process.

In summary, Yarn and Gulp have key differences in terms of their functionality and purpose. Yarn is primarily focused on efficient dependency management, while Gulp is a task runner that specializes in task automation and code optimization.

Advice on gulp, Yarn

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

Reviewon

Yarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

gulp	Yarn
Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.	Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
By preferring code over configuration, gulp keeps simple things simple and makes complex tasks manageable.;By harnessing the power of node's streams you get fast builds that don't write intermediary files to disk.;gulp's strict plugin guidelines assure plugins stay simple and work the way you expect.;With a minimal API surface, you can pick up gulp in no time. Your build works just like you envision it: a series of streaming pipes.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.0K	GitHub Stars 41.5K
GitHub Forks 4.2K	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 14.3K	Stacks 24.8K
Followers 9.1K	Followers 13.5K
Votes 1.7K	Votes 151
Pros & Cons
Pros 451 Build speed 277 Readable 244 Code-over-configuration 210 Open source 175 Node streams	Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to gulp, Yarn?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.